Literature DB >> 3190439

Activation of the sensory irritant receptor by C7-C11 n-alkanes.

U Kristiansen1, G D Nielsen.   

Abstract

The sensory irritation effect of vapours of n-alkanes with 7-11 carbon atoms was determined from a trigeminal reflex, decreasing the respiratory rate in mice. The maximum effect within the first 10 min of the exposure period decreased from heptane to undecane, equivalent to a decrease in intrinsic activity. The concentration which depressed the respiratory rate by 50% (RD-50) was 17,400 ppm for heptane. The n-alkanes C8-C11 were not able to produce this response level. The threshold concentration (RD-0) decreased from heptane to undecane, which corresponds to an increase in potency. The thermodynamic analysis suggests, however, that the affinity constants are equal, and thus the increase in potency is suggested to be due to altered distribution between the gas-air phase and the receptor phase. The expression 0.2. RD-0 was used to estimate the upper limits for sensory irritation which are expected to be acceptable in the industrial working environment. The corresponding limits are 1205, 605 and 125 ppm, for heptane, octane and nonane, respectively. For decane the limit is expected to be above 22 ppm. We were not able to obtain an estimate for undecane due to the low intrinsic activity. Pulmonary irritation was found to be weak, except for heptane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3190439     DOI: 10.1007/bf00293686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  20 in total

1.  Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1976-06

2.  Nasal trigeminal chemoreception: responses to n-aliphatic alcohols.

Authors:  W L Silver; J R Mason; M A Adams; C A Smeraski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-06-25       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Acute inhalation toxicology of volatile hydrocarbons.

Authors:  H E Swann; B K Kwon; G K Hogan; W M Snellings
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1974-09

Review 4.  Sensory irritation by airborne chemicals.

Authors:  Y Alarie
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1973-11

5.  Contribution of the trigeminal nerve to perceived odor magnitude.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Comparison of gustatory receptors, olfactory receptors, and free nerve endings.

Authors:  L M Beidler
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1965

7.  Evaluation of sensory irritation from acrolein-formaldehyde mixtures.

Authors:  L E Kane; Y Alarie
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1978-04

8.  Sensory irritation and pulmonary irritation of cumene and n-propanol: mechanisms of receptor activation and desensitization.

Authors:  U Kristiansen; L Hansen; G D Nielsen; E Holst
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1986-07

9.  Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans.

Authors:  R L Doty
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06

10.  Propyl ether. II. Pulmonary irritation and anaesthesia.

Authors:  G D Nielsen; J Olsen; J C Bakbo; E Holst
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1985-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Sensory irritation and pulmonary irritation of n-methyl ketones: receptor activation mechanisms and relationships with threshold limit values.

Authors:  L F Hansen; G D Nielsen
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Predicting co-morbidities in chemically sensitive individuals from exhaled breath analysis.

Authors:  Harold I Zeliger; Yaqin Pan; William J Rea
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2012-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.