Literature DB >> 22293937

Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Paul M Wise1, Charles J Wysocki, Johan N Lundström.   

Abstract

Both the olfactory and the trigeminal systems are able to respond to intranasal presentations of chemical vapor. Accordingly, when the nose detects a volatile chemical, it is often unclear whether we smell it, feel it, or both. The distinction may often be unimportant in our everyday perception of fragrances or aromas, but it can matter in experiments that purport to isolate olfactory processes or study the interaction between olfaction and chemesthesis. Researchers turn to a small pool of compounds that are believed to be "pure olfactory" stimuli with little or no trigeminal impact. The current report reexamines one such commonly used compound, namely eugenol, a flavor and fragrance ingredient that has anesthetic properties under some conditions. Using a standard method involving many trials during an experimental session (Experiment 1), subjects were unable to reliably lateralize eugenol, consistent with claims that this compound is detected primarily through olfaction. However, with more limited exposure (Experiments 2 and 3), subjects were able to lateralize eugenol. We speculate that anesthetic properties of eugenol could blunt its trigeminal impact in some paradigms. Regardless, the current experiments suggest that eugenol can in fact stimulate the trigeminal nerve but in a complex concentration-dependent manner. Implications and strategies for selection of model odorants are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293937      PMCID: PMC3379841          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  37 in total

1.  Olfactory functions are mediated by parallel and hierarchical processing.

Authors:  I Savic; B Gulyas; M Larsson; P Roland
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of odor identification: the effect of aging.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; H D Critchley; J Suckling; R Fukuda; S C Williams; C Andrew; R Howard; E Ouldred; C Bryant; C G Swift; S H Jackson
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span.

Authors:  Charles J Wysocki; Beverly J Cowart; Tomas Radil
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

4.  Unconscious odor detection could not be due to odor itself.

Authors:  Laurence Jacquot; Julie Monnin; Gérard Brand
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Brain activation during odor perception in males and females.

Authors:  S Bengtsson; H Berglund; B Gulyas; E Cohen; I Savic
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.

Authors:  R L Doty; W E Brugger; P C Jurs; M A Orndorff; P J Snyder; L D Lowry
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-02

7.  The effect of menthol vapor on nasal sensitivity to chemical irritation.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; George Preti; Jason Eades; Charles J Wysocki
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Individual differences in sensitivity to the odor of 4,16-androstadien-3-one.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Thomas Hummel; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans.

Authors:  R L Doty
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06

10.  Psychological effects of subthreshold exposure to the putative human pheromone 4,16-androstadien-3-one.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Miguel Gonçalves; Francisco Esteves; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.587

View more
  9 in total

1.  Eugenol and carvacrol excite first- and second-order trigeminal neurons and enhance their heat-evoked responses.

Authors:  A H Klein; C L Joe; A Davoodi; K Takechi; M I Carstens; E Carstens
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Enhanced Odorant Localization Abilities in Congenitally Blind but not in Late-Blind Individuals.

Authors:  Simona Manescu; Christine Chouinard-Leclaire; Olivier Collignon; Franco Lepore; Johannes Frasnelli
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Perceptual mapping of chemesthetic stimuli in naïve assessors.

Authors:  Nadia Byrnes; Michael A Nestrud; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Olfactory Orientation and Navigation in Humans.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs; Jennifer Arter; Amy Cook; Frank J Sulloway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measures of odor and lateralization thresholds of acrolein, crotonaldehyde, and hexanal using a novel vapor delivery technique.

Authors:  Lena Ernstgård; Aishwarya M Dwivedi; Johan N Lundström; Gunnar Johanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of Smell and Taste Disturbances among COVID-19 Convalescent Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Armenia.

Authors:  Karine Melkumyan; Darshan Shingala; Syuzanna Simonyan; Hrag Torossian; Karen Mkrtumyan; Karen Dilbaryan; Garri Davtyan; Erik Vardumyan; Konstantin Yenkoyan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Dual processing streams in chemosensory perception.

Authors:  Johannes Frasnelli; Johan N Lundström; Veronika Schöpf; Simona Negoias; Thomas Hummel; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Brain responses to odor mixtures with sub-threshold components.

Authors:  Thomas Hummel; Selda Olgun; Johannes Gerber; Ursula Huchel; Johannes Frasnelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-24

9.  Effects of "trigeminal training" on trigeminal sensitivity and self-rated nasal patency.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Timo Schultheiss; Valentin A Schriever; Jana Linke; Mandy Cuevas; Antje Hähner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.