Literature DB >> 2345692

Odorous and pungent attributes of mixed and unmixed odorants.

J E Cometto-Muñiz1, S M Hernández.   

Abstract

In order to explore functional properties of the olfactory and common chemical senses as well as their relation to the total nasal sensation experienced, various concentrations of two pungent odorants were presented alone and in the presence of different backgrounds of the other irritant. Stimuli comprised formaldehyde (at 1.0, 3.5, 6.9, and 16.7 ppm), ammonia (at 210, 776, 1,172, and 1,716 ppm), and their 16 possible binary mixtures. Subjects were asked to estimate the total nasal perceived intensity, and then to assess the olfactory (odor) and common chemical (pungency) attributes of the evoked sensations. The results showed that stimulus-response functions for pungency are steeper than those for odor. Furthermore, odor was always hypoadditive in mixtures (i.e., mixtures were perceived as less intense than the sum of their components), whereas pungency was, mainly, additive, and even suggested hyperadditivity. Total perceived intensity of the stimuli, alone and in mixtures, followed the stimulus-response patterns for pungency, which, therefore, emerged as the dominating attribute used by subjects in scaling the explored range of concentrations. The relationship between total nasal perceived intensity of the mixtures and that of their components reflected hypoaddition, resembling the outcome for the odor attribute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2345692     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1976-06

2.  Responses by humans to oral chemical irritants as a function of locus of stimulation.

Authors:  H T Lawless; D A Stevens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

3.  Perception of sweetness: the effects of concentration and temperature.

Authors:  A M Calviño
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

4.  Comparison of gustatory receptors, olfactory receptors, and free nerve endings.

Authors:  L M Beidler
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1965

5.  Quality and intensity of binary odor mixtures.

Authors:  D G Laing; H Panhuber; M E Willcox; E A Pittman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-08

6.  Taste and olfaction: independence vs interaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-03

7.  Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation.

Authors:  J C Stevens; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-05

8.  Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol.

Authors:  C Murphy
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-03

9.  Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans.

Authors:  R L Doty
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06

10.  Bilateral integration in the common chemical sense.

Authors:  M R Garcia Medina; W S Cain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Monitoring gaseous CO2 and ethanol above champagne glasses: flute versus coupe, and the role of temperature.

Authors:  Gérard Liger-Belair; Marielle Bourget; Hervé Pron; Guillaume Polidori; Clara Cilindre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Photoactivation of olfactory sensory neurons does not affect action potential conduction in individual trigeminal sensory axons innervating the rodent nasal cavity.

Authors:  Margot Maurer; Nunzia Papotto; Julika Sertel-Nakajima; Markus Schueler; Roberto De Col; Frank Möhrlen; Karl Messlinger; Stephan Frings; Richard W Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of "trigeminal training" on trigeminal sensitivity and self-rated nasal patency.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Timo Schultheiss; Valentin A Schriever; Jana Linke; Mandy Cuevas; Antje Hähner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.