Literature DB >> 7738500

Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.

R M Shiffrin1, D E Huber, K Marinelli.   

Abstract

In most recognition models a decision is based on a global measure often termed familiarity. However, a response criterion is free to vary across lists varying in length and strength, making familiarity changes immeasurable. We presented a single list with a mixture of exemplars from many categories, so that the criterion would be unlikely to vary with length or strength of the category of the test item. False alarms rose with category length but not category strength, suggesting that familiarity does not change much with changes in strength of other items but grows when additional items are studied. The results were well fit by an extension of the search of associative memory (SAM) model presented by R. M. Shiffrin, R. Ratcliff, and S. E. Clark (1990).

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738500     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  31 in total

1.  The effects of emotional content and aging on false memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Kinnell; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

4.  Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Bridgid Finn; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

7.  The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

8.  Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

Review 9.  A signal detection analysis of the recognition heuristic.

Authors:  Timothy J Pleskac
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

10.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.