Literature DB >> 11762234

Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses.

T Wang1, G S Dordevic, R Shadmehr.   

Abstract

Some characteristics of arm movements that humans exhibit during learning the dynamics of reaching are consistent with a theoretical framework where training results in motor commands that are gradually modified to predict and compensate for novel forces that may act on the hand. As a first approximation, the motor control system behaves as an adapting controller that learns an internal model of the dynamics of the task. It approximates inverse dynamics and predicts motor commands that are appropriate for a desired limb trajectory. However, we had previously noted that subtle motion characteristics observed during changes in task dynamics challenged this simple model and raised the possibility that adaptation also involved sensory-motor feedback pathways. These pathways reacted to sensory feedback during the course of the movement. Here we hypothesize that adaptation to dynamics might also involve a modification of how the CNS responds to sensory feedback. We tested this through experiments that quantified how the motor system's response to errors during voluntary movements changed as it adapted to dynamics of a force field. We describe a nonlinear approach that approximates the impedance of the arm, i.e., force response as a function of arm displacement trajectory. We observe that after adaptation, the impedance function changes in a way that closely matches and counters the effect of the force field. This is particularly prominent in the long-latency (> 100 ms) component of response to perturbations. Therefore, it appears that practice not only modifies the internal model with which the brain generates motor commands that initiate a movement, but also the internal model with which sensory feedback is integrated with the ongoing descending commands in order to respond to error during the movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11762234      PMCID: PMC2553889          DOI: 10.1007/s004220100277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  14 in total

1.  Impedance characteristics of a neuromusculoskeletal model of the human arm II. Movement control.

Authors:  S Stroeve
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spinal mechanisms of the functional stretch reflex.

Authors:  C Ghez; Y Shinoda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement.

Authors:  H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control.

Authors:  M A Smith; J Brandt; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Long-latency stretch reflexes as co-ordinated functional responses in man.

Authors:  C C Gielen; L Ramaekers; E J van Zuylen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Carrozzo; N A Borghese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  19 in total

1.  Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Etienne Burdet; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control.

Authors:  Mark J Wagner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Preparing to reach: selecting an adaptive long-latency feedback controller.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Farzad Towhidkhah; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Tyler Cluff; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A computational model of limb impedance control based on principles of internal model uncertainty.

Authors:  Djordje Mitrovic; Stefan Klanke; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Philippe Boulinguez; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.