Literature DB >> 3256617

Long-latency stretch reflexes as co-ordinated functional responses in man.

C C Gielen1, L Ramaekers, E J van Zuylen.   

Abstract

1. Reflex activity in human arm muscles has been measured in response to torque perturbations around the elbow joint in the flexion-extension direction and/or the supination-pronation direction. Intramuscular fine-wire electrodes were used to record electromyographic (EMG) activity in the muscles. A pre-load was applied in the same direction as or in a different direction to the perturbation. The subjects were instructed to 'hold on', which means that they had to actively resist the perturbation without unduly co-activating their muscles. 2. The EMG activity showed segmented reflex responses with short-latency (25-50 ms) and long-latency (50-75 ms) components, followed by other bursts of activity which probably originated from the subject's voluntary or triggered reactions. 3. Motor units in m. triceps gave short-latency and long-latency responses to imposed elbow extension but only long-latency responses were seen to imposed pronation, which does not stretch m. triceps. Motor units in m. brachialis gave short-latency and long-latency excitatory (inhibitory) responses to imposed extension (flexion) torques. However, only long-latency inhibitory responses were observed to imposed pronation torques. Motor units in m. biceps gave short-latency and long-latency excitatory responses to imposed pronation torques. 4. These results show that the long-latency reflex cannot be the result of a simple feed-back mechanism that controls muscle length only. We argue that the long-latency reflex activity reflects the co-ordinated activation of muscles which is necessary for an adequate response. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the distribution of long-latency reflex activity over muscles was found to be similar to the distribution of activation found during a voluntary exerted torque in the direction opposite to the applied perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3256617      PMCID: PMC1191203          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  20 in total

1.  The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuro-muscular response.

Authors:  P H HAMMOND
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-04-27       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex.

Authors:  P E Crago; J C Houk; Z Hasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Monosynaptic excitation of motoneurones from secondary endings of muscle spindles.

Authors:  P A Kirkwood; T A Sears
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evidence from the use of vibration that the human long-latency stretch reflex depends upon spindle secondary afferents.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long-latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P D Cheney; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The 'late' reflex responses to muscle stretch: the 'resonance hypothesis' versus the 'long-loop hypothesis'.

Authors:  G Eklund; K E Hagbarth; J V Hägglund; E U Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanical oscillations contributing to the segmentation of the reflex electromyogram response to stretching human muscles.

Authors:  G Eklund; K E Hagbarth; J V Hägglund; E U Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A grab reflex in the human hand.

Authors:  M M Traub; J C Rothwell; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  The mechanical effectiveness of short latency reflexes in human triceps surae muscles revealed by ischaemia and vibration.

Authors:  J H Allum; K H Mauritz; H Vögele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Intrinsic and afferent components in apparent muscle stiffness in man.

Authors:  M H Vincken; C C Gielen; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  41 in total

1.  Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses.

Authors:  T Wang; G S Dordevic; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  On the localization of the stretch reflex of intrinsic hand muscles in a patient with mirror movements.

Authors:  P B Matthews; S F Farmer; D A Ingram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sensing with the motor cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Aaron J Suminski
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Reflex responses in the lower leg following landing impact on an inverting and non-inverting platform.

Authors:  C Grüneberg; P H J A Nieuwenhuijzen; J Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The time course for kinetic versus kinematic planning of goal-directed human motor behavior.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; Helena Vander; Xiaogang Yan; Lauren E Sergio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow.

Authors:  Bernard Baumberger; Brice Isableu; Michelangelo Flückiger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Contributions of altered stretch reflex coordination to arm impairments following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Matthew A Krutky; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.