Literature DB >> 12783150

Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics.

David W Franklin1, Etienne Burdet, Rieko Osu, Mitsuo Kawato, Theodore E Milner.   

Abstract

This study compared the mechanisms of adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics from the perspective of changes in joint mechanics. Subjects were instructed to make point to point movements in force fields generated by a robotic manipulandum which interacted with the arm in either a stable or an unstable manner. After subjects adjusted to the initial disturbing effects of the force fields they were able to produce normal straight movements to the target. In the case of the stable interaction, subjects modified the joint torques in order to appropriately compensate for the force field. No change in joint torque or endpoint force was required or observed in the case of the unstable interaction. After adaptation, the endpoint stiffness of the arm was measured by applying displacements to the hand in eight different directions midway through the movements. This was compared to the stiffness measured similarly during movements in a null force field. After adaptation, the endpoint stiffness under both the stable and unstable dynamics was modified relative to the null field. Adaptation to unstable dynamics was achieved by selective modification of endpoint stiffness in the direction of the instability. To investigate whether the change in endpoint stiffness could be accounted for by change in joint torque or endpoint force, we estimated the change in stiffness on each trial based on the change in joint torque relative to the null field. For stable dynamics the change in endpoint stiffness was accurately predicted. However, for unstable dynamics the change in endpoint stiffness could not be reproduced. In fact, the predicted endpoint stiffness was similar to that in the null force field. Thus, the change in endpoint stiffness seen after adaptation to stable dynamics was directly related to changes in net joint torque necessary to compensate for the dynamics in contrast to adaptation to unstable dynamics, where a selective change in endpoint stiffness occurred without any modification of net joint torque.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783150     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1443-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Stiffness regulation by reflex action in the normal human hand.

Authors:  R R Carter; P E Crago; M W Keith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The control of stable postures in the multijoint arm.

Authors:  J McIntyre; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier; A B Leger; D W Franklin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Nonlinear stretch reflex interaction during cocontraction.

Authors:  R R Carter; P E Crago; P H Gorman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations.

Authors:  S C Cannon; G I Zahalak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Electromyographic response to pseudo-random torque disturbances of human forearm position.

Authors:  J R Dufresne; J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Carrozzo; N A Borghese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  45 in total

1.  Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.

Authors:  E J Lai; A J Hodgson; T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential effects of mental load on proximal and distal arm muscle activity.

Authors:  Jules G Bloemsaat; Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Gerard P Van Galen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Leg muscle recruitment during cycling is less developed in triathletes than cyclists despite matched cycling training loads.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Bill Vicenzino; Peter Blanch; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Asymmetric interjoint feedback contributes to postural control of redundant multi-link systems.

Authors:  Nathan E Bunderson; Lena H Ting; Thomas J Burkholder
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  The influence of visual perturbations on the neural control of limb stiffness.

Authors:  Jeremy Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Nicole Malfait; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Critical damping conditions for third order muscle models: implications for force control.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Ferdinando A Mussa Ivaldi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning.

Authors:  Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.