Literature DB >> 11726528

Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB.

M Mizuuchi1, K Mizuuchi.   

Abstract

Initiation of phage Mu DNA transposition requires assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes called Mu transpososomes containing the two Mu DNA ends and MuA transposase tetramer. Mu transpososome assembly is highly regulated and involves multiple DNA sites for transposase binding, including a transpositional enhancer called the internal activation sequence (IAS). In addition, a number of protein cofactors participate, including the target DNA activator MuB ATPase. We investigated the impact of the assembly cofactors on the kinetics of transpososome assembly with the aim of deciphering the reaction steps that are influenced by the cofactors. The transpositional enhancer IAS appears to have little impact on the initial pairing of the two Mu end segments bound by MuA. Instead, it accelerates the post-synaptic conformational step(s) that converts the reversible complex to the stable transpososome. The transpososome assembly stimulation by MuB does not require its stable DNA binding activity, which appears critical for directing transposition to sites distant from the donor transposon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11726528      PMCID: PMC125764          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  33 in total

Review 1.  Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements.

Authors:  K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-07-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase.

Authors:  T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage.

Authors:  M G Surette; G Chaconas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-03-20       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA.

Authors:  M G Surette; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

Authors:  M G Surette; T Harkness; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer.

Authors:  R G Allison; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Steady-state kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis by the B protein of bacteriophage mu. Involvement of protein oligomerization in the ATPase cycle.

Authors:  K Adzuma; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome.

Authors:  B D Lavoie; B S Chan; R G Allison; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  8 in total

1.  A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition.

Authors:  Shailja Pathania; Makkuni Jayaram; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  Joy F Yuan; Daniel R Beniac; George Chaconas; F Peter Ottensmeyer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Remodeling protein complexes: insights from the AAA+ unfoldase ClpX and Mu transposase.

Authors:  Briana M Burton; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Control of transposase activity within a transpososome by the configuration of the flanking DNA segment of the transposon.

Authors:  Michiyo Mizuuchi; Phoebe A Rice; Simon J Wardle; David B Haniford; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rudra P Saha; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

7.  Transposition Behavior Revealed by High-Resolution Description of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Saltovirus Integration Sites.

Authors:  Gilles Vergnaud; Cédric Midoux; Yann Blouin; Maria Bourkaltseva; Victor Krylov; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Authors:  Sherwin P Montaño; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.