Literature DB >> 1655409

Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome.

B D Lavoie1, B S Chan, R G Allison, G Chaconas.   

Abstract

The Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction proceeds via two stable higher order nucleoprotein complexes, the Type 1 and Type 2 transpososomes. The Mu A protein is responsible for the structural and functional integrity of the Type 1 transpososome. We have investigated the quaternary structure of the Mu A protein within this complex by chemical cross-linking experiments and found that the basic structural unit is an A tetramer. Three Mu A binding sites in the transpososome are protected by DNase I footprinting: the outermost A binding sites L1 and R1, as well as R2. Genetic evidence is also presented which corroborates this result. Efficient formation of Type 1 complexes occurs in mini-Mus with the L3 or R3 sites deleted or when the L2 site has been substituted; but no reaction occurs in the absence of R2. The protection at the L1 and R1 sites extends 12-13 bp beyond the Mu-host junctions as seen by DNase I and methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II) [MPE.Fe(II)] foot-printing, indicating Mu A contacts with the flanking host sequences in the transpososome but not on linear DNA; furthermore, hydroxyl radical footprinting shows an unprecedentedly large enhancement on the continuous strand, 2 bp beyond the nick site outside the Mu right end, which suggests that an altered DNA structure is induced upon Type 1 complex formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1655409      PMCID: PMC453020          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  36 in total

1.  Hydroxyl radical "footprinting": high-resolution information about DNA-protein contacts and application to lambda repressor and Cro protein.

Authors:  T D Tullius; B A Dombroski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

Authors:  M G Surette; T Harkness; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The interaction of E. coli IHF protein with its specific binding sites.

Authors:  C C Yang; H A Nash
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Characterization of amber mutations in bacteriophage Mu transposase: a functional analysis of the protein.

Authors:  L Desmet; M Faelen; M J Gama; A Ferhat; A Toussaint
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer.

Authors:  P C Leung; D B Teplow; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  In vivo mutagenesis of bacteriophage Mu transposase.

Authors:  A Toussaint; L Desmet; M Faelen; R Alazard; M Chandler; M Pato
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate.

Authors:  R Craigie; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Mechanism of Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  G Chaconas; M G Surette
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancer-like element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor (IHF).

Authors:  M G Surette; B D Lavoie; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  71 in total

1.  Conditional RAG-1 mutants block the hairpin formation step of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  S B Kale; M A Landree; D B Roth
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The DDE motif in RAG-1 is contributed in trans to a single active site that catalyzes the nicking and transesterification steps of V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  P C Swanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A highly conserved domain of the maize activator transposase is involved in dimerization.

Authors:  L Essers; R H Adolphs; R Kunze
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking.

Authors:  Q M Eastman; I J Villey; D G Schatz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Handoff from recombinase to replisome: insights from transposition.

Authors:  H Nakai; V Doseeva; J M Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Asymmetric processing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cDNA in vivo: implications for functional end coupling during the chemical steps of DNA transposition.

Authors:  H Chen; A Engelman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Tipping the balance between replicative and simple transposition.

Authors:  N P Tavakoli; K M Derbyshire
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Determinants for hairpin formation in Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  J S Allingham; S J Wardle; D B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.