Literature DB >> 11721954

Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

F A Habermann1, M Cremer, J Walter, G Kreth, J von Hase, K Bauer, J Wienberg, C Cremer, T Cremer, I Solovei.   

Abstract

Arrangements of chromosome territories in nuclei of chicken fibroblasts and neurons were analysed employing multicolour chromosome painting, laser confocal scanning microscopy and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. The chicken karyotype consists of 9 pairs of macrochromosomes and 30 pairs of microchromosomes. Although the latter represent only 23% of the chicken genome they containalmost 50% of its genes. We show that territories of microchromosomes in fibroblasts and neurons were clustered within the centre of the nucleus, while territories of the macrochromosomes were preferentially located towards the nuclear periphery. In contrast to these highly consistent radial arrangements, the relative arrangements of macrochromosome territories with respect to each other (side-by-side arrangements) were variable. A stringent radial arrangement of macro- and microchromosomes was found in mitotic cells. Replication labelling studies revealed a pattern of DNA replication similar to mammalian cell nuclei: gene dense, early replicating chromatin mostly represented by microchromosomes, was located within the nuclear interior, surrounded by a rim of late replicating chromatin. These results support the evolutionary conservation of several features of higher-order chromatin organization between mammals and birds despite the differences in their karyotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721954     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012447318535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  38 in total

1.  Micro- and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome.

Authors:  D K Griffin; F Haberman; J Masabanda; P O'Brien; M Bagga; A Sazanov; J Smith; D W Burt; M Ferguson-Smith; J Wienberg
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

2.  Differences in gene density on chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes.

Authors:  J Smith; C K Bruley; I R Paton; I Dunn; C T Jones; D Windsor; D R Morrice; A S Law; J Masabanda; A Sazanov; D Waddington; R Fries; D W Burt
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Correlated positioning of homologous chromosomes in daughter fibroblast cells.

Authors:  H B Sun; H Yokota
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Large-scale chromatin fibers of living cells display a discontinuous functional organization.

Authors:  N Sadoni; K F Sullivan; P Weinzierl; E H Stelzer; D Zink
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigenetic regulation.

Authors:  J C Rice; C D Allis
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.382

6.  Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals.

Authors:  S B Hedges; P H Parker; C G Sibley; S Kumar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome.

Authors:  C R Primmer; T Raudsepp; B P Chowdhary; A P Møller; H Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  A physical map of 30,000 human genes.

Authors:  P Deloukas; G D Schuler; G Gyapay; E M Beasley; C Soderlund; P Rodriguez-Tomé; L Hui; T C Matise; K B McKusick; J S Beckmann; S Bentolila; M Bihoreau; B B Birren; J Browne; A Butler; A B Castle; N Chiannilkulchai; C Clee; P J Day; A Dehejia; T Dibling; N Drouot; S Duprat; C Fizames; S Fox; S Gelling; L Green; P Harrison; R Hocking; E Holloway; S Hunt; S Keil; P Lijnzaad; C Louis-Dit-Sully; J Ma; A Mendis; J Miller; J Morissette; D Muselet; H C Nusbaum; A Peck; S Rozen; D Simon; D K Slonim; R Staples; L D Stein; E A Stewart; M A Suchard; T Thangarajah; N Vega-Czarny; C Webber; X Wu; J Hudson; C Auffray; N Nomura; J M Sikela; M H Polymeropoulos; M R James; E S Lander; T J Hudson; R M Myers; D R Cox; J Weissenbach; M S Boguski; D R Bentley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Chicken microchromosomes are hyperacetylated, early replicating, and gene rich.

Authors:  H A McQueen; G Siriaco; A P Bird
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  90 in total

1.  Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells.

Authors:  M Cremer; J von Hase; T Volm; A Brero; G Kreth; J Walter; C Fischer; I Solovei; C Cremer; T Cremer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tanabe; Stefan Müller; Michaela Neusser; Johann von Hase; Enzo Calcagno; Marion Cremer; Irina Solovei; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types.

Authors:  Irina Solovei; Lothar Schermelleh; Klaus Düring; Andrea Engelhardt; Stefan Stein; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code.

Authors:  G Kreth; J Finsterle; J von Hase; M Cremer; C Cremer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Chromosome territories.

Authors:  Thomas Cremer; Marion Cremer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Three-dimensional architecture of tandem repeats in chicken interphase nucleus.

Authors:  Antonina Maslova; Anna Zlotina; Nadezhda Kosyakova; Marina Sidorova; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  The genome and the nucleus: a marriage made by evolution. Genome organisation and nuclear architecture.

Authors:  Helen A Foster; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes.

Authors:  Ales Pecinka; Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Gregor Kreth; Marco Klatte; Martin A Lysak; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Molecular cytogenetic definition of the chicken genome: the first complete avian karyotype.

Authors:  Julio S Masabanda; Dave W Burt; Patricia C M O'Brien; Alain Vignal; Valerie Fillon; Philippa S Walsh; Helen Cox; Helen G Tempest; Jacqueline Smith; Felix Habermann; Michael Schmid; Yoichi Matsuda; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Bridging chromatin structure and function over a range of experimental spatial and temporal scales by molecular modeling.

Authors:  Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.