Literature DB >> 11721953

Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells.

M Cremer1, J von Hase, T Volm, A Brero, G Kreth, J Walter, C Fischer, I Solovei, C Cremer, T Cremer.   

Abstract

A quantitative comparison of higher-order chromatin arrangements was performed in human cell types with three-dimensionally (3D) preserved, differently shaped nuclei. These cell types included flat-ellipsoid nuclei of diploid amniotic fluid cells and fibroblasts and spherical nuclei of B and T lymphocytes from peripheral human blood. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with chromosome paint probes for large (#1-5) and small (#17-20) autosomes, and for the two sex chromosomes. Other probes delineated heterochromatin blocks of numerous larger and smaller human chromosomes. Shape differences correlated with distinct differences in higher order chromatin arrangements: in the spherically shaped lymphocyte nuclei we noted the preferential positioning of the small, gene dense #17, 19 and 20 chromosome territories (CTs) in the 3D nuclear interior--typically without any apparent connection to the nuclear envelope. In contrast, CTs of the gene-poor small chromosomes #18 and Y were apparently attached at the nuclear envelope. CTs of large chromosomes were also preferentially located towards the nuclear periphery. In the ellipsoid nuclei of amniotic fluid cells and fibroblasts, all tested CTs showed attachments to the upper and/or lower part of the nuclear envelope: CTs of small chromosomes, including #18 and Y, were located towards the centre of the nuclear projection (CNP), while the large chromosomes were positioned towards the 2D nuclear rim. In contrast to these highly reproducible radial arrangements, 2D distances measured between heterochromatin blocks of homologous and heterologous CTs were strikingly variable. These results as well as CT painting let us conclude that nuclear functions in the studied cell types may not require reproducible side-by-side arrangements of specific homologous or non-homologous CTs. 3D-modelling of statistical arrangements of 46 human CTs in spherical nuclei was performed under the assumption of a linear correlation between DNA content of each chromosome and its CT volume. In a set of modelled nuclei, we noted the preferential localization of smaller CTs towards the 3D periphery and of larger CTs towards the 3D centre. This distribution is in clear contrast to the experimentally observed distribution in lymphocyte nuclei. We conclude that presently unknown factors (other than topological constraints) may play a decisive role to enforce the different radial arrangements of large and small CTs observed in ellipsoid and spherical human cell nuclei.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11721953     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012495201697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  62 in total

1.  Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells.

Authors:  M N Nikiforova; J R Stringer; R Blough; M Medvedovic; J A Fagin; Y E Nikiforov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Removal of repetitive sequences from FISH probes using PCR-assisted affinity chromatography.

Authors:  J M Craig; J Kraus; T Cremer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Organization of a repetitive human 1.8 kb KpnI sequence localized in the heterochromatin of chromosome 15.

Authors:  M J Higgins; H S Wang; I Shtromas; T Haliotis; J C Roder; J J Holden; B N White
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus.

Authors:  D E Comings
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Epithelial character and morphologic diversity of cell cultures from human amniotic fluids examined by immunofluorescence microscopy and gel electrophoresis of cytoskeletal proteins.

Authors:  B A Ochs; W W Franke; R Moll; C Grund; M Cremer; T Cremer
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Unscheduled DNA synthesis after partial UV irradiation of the cell nucleus. Distribution in interphase and metaphase.

Authors:  C Zorn; C Cremer; T Cremer; J Zimmer
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts.

Authors:  J M Bridger; S Boyle; I R Kill; W A Bickmore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories.

Authors:  M Schardin; T Cremer; H D Hager; M Lang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  A physical map of 30,000 human genes.

Authors:  P Deloukas; G D Schuler; G Gyapay; E M Beasley; C Soderlund; P Rodriguez-Tomé; L Hui; T C Matise; K B McKusick; J S Beckmann; S Bentolila; M Bihoreau; B B Birren; J Browne; A Butler; A B Castle; N Chiannilkulchai; C Clee; P J Day; A Dehejia; T Dibling; N Drouot; S Duprat; C Fizames; S Fox; S Gelling; L Green; P Harrison; R Hocking; E Holloway; S Hunt; S Keil; P Lijnzaad; C Louis-Dit-Sully; J Ma; A Mendis; J Miller; J Morissette; D Muselet; H C Nusbaum; A Peck; S Rozen; D Simon; D K Slonim; R Staples; L D Stein; E A Stewart; M A Suchard; T Thangarajah; N Vega-Czarny; C Webber; X Wu; J Hudson; C Auffray; N Nomura; J M Sikela; M H Polymeropoulos; M R James; E S Lander; T J Hudson; R M Myers; D R Cox; J Weissenbach; M S Boguski; D R Bentley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  163 in total

1.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tanabe; Stefan Müller; Michaela Neusser; Johann von Hase; Enzo Calcagno; Marion Cremer; Irina Solovei; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chromosomes are predominantly located randomly with respect to each other in interphase human cells.

Authors:  Michael N Cornforth; Karin M Greulich-Bode; Bradford D Loucas; Javier Arsuaga; Mariel Vázquez; Rainer K Sachs; Martina Brückner; Michael Molls; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; David J Brenner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 10.539

4.  Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population.

Authors:  Wendy A Bickmore; Peter Teague
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Authors:  Alexander Lorenz; Jörg Fuchs; Reinhard Bürger; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

6.  Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types.

Authors:  Irina Solovei; Lothar Schermelleh; Klaus Düring; Andrea Engelhardt; Stefan Stein; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code.

Authors:  G Kreth; J Finsterle; J von Hase; M Cremer; C Cremer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Non-random positioning of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei.

Authors:  Irina A Zalenskaya; Andrei O Zalensky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  Nuclear lamins.

Authors:  Thomas Dechat; Stephen A Adam; Pekka Taimen; Takeshi Shimi; Robert D Goldman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes.

Authors:  Ales Pecinka; Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Gregor Kreth; Marco Klatte; Martin A Lysak; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.