Literature DB >> 11716396

Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

J P McAuley1, G A Engh, D J Ammeen.   

Abstract

Little information has been published on the salvage of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The current authors examined the failure mechanisms, complexity of surgery, and complications in such revisions. Of 39 consecutive unicompartmental knee revisions, two patients died within 2 years of surgery, four had inadequate followup, and one was excluded because of infection before revision. Therefore, 30 patients (32 knees) were followed up a mean 53 months. The patients were a mean age of 59 years at the time of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and were predominantly male (60%). Revisions were done 9 to 204 months after the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The predominant failure mechanism was polyethylene wear; however, nine failed because of loosening. The mean polyethylene thickness of the failed arthroplasties was 7.3 mm. Revision procedures were straightforward. Ten patients required local autograft but no allografts were used. Primary femoral components were used in all patients; 25 were cruciate-retaining. Fourteen patients had stemmed tibial components; eight had wedge augments. The mean range of motion after revision was 111 degrees. Six patients had complications not requiring intervention. Three patients had rerevision surgery for polyethylene wear at 76, 77, and 102 months, respectively, two of whom required polyethylene insert and patellar component revision. The third patient also required tibial component revision for osteolysis. Although this is a small series, the simplicity of the procedure and the complications encountered compare favorably with those of total knee revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716396     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Fracture of the femoral component of a Brigham unicompartmental knee: a case report.

Authors:  Konstantinos Panousis; Claire Murnaghan; Petra Koettig; Peter Grigoris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 4.  [Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Kirschner; J Lützner; S Fickert; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simone Cerciello; Brent Joseph Morris; Sebastien Lustig; Enrico Visonà; Giuliano Cerciello; Katia Corona; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Fink; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Katja Tecklenburg; Christian Hoser
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Gilles Estour; Charbel Nemer; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; M K Sayana; F Onayemi; T McCarthy; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.