Literature DB >> 16369847

[Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

S Kirschner1, J Lützner, S Fickert, K-P Günther.   

Abstract

Despite the good midterm survivorship reported for unicondylar knee arthroplasty, an increase in revision surgery has to be expected due to increased replacement rates. The reasons for failure as well as distribution are different for unicondylar knee arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty. The main reasons for revision are aseptic loosening and the progression of osteoarthritis. In most cases, unicondylar knee arthroplasty will be revised to total knee arthroplasty. To obtain good revision results, the cause of implant failure has to be analysed carefully. In the case of contained bone defects, the reconstruction can be supported with bone grafting. For those cases with uncontained defects, implants with augmentation and, in some cases, stem extensions are needed. The modularity of the revision implant should cover different intraoperative requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16369847     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0910-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  27 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Kathleen K Killeen; Daniel P Hoeffel; Jack M Bert; Thomas K Comfort; Karen Scheltema; Susan Mehle; Katherine Grimm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study.

Authors:  S Lewold; O Robertsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-10

4.  Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements.

Authors:  A E Weale; O A Halabi; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee.

Authors:  R P Grelsamer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses.

Authors:  O Robertsson; L Borgquist; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-04

7.  Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement--a feasibility study.

Authors:  D J Beard; D W Murray; J L Rees; A J Price; C A F Dodd
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W N Levine; R M Ozuna; R D Scott; T S Thornhill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Radiological changes ten years after St. Georg Sled unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  O H Khan; H Davies; J H Newman; A E Weale
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of keel saw blade design and thickness on the incidence of tibial plateau fracture and tibial implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR.

Authors:  Lena Keppler; Steffen Klingbeil; Alexander Martin Keppler; Johannes Becker; Christian Fulghum; Björn Michel; Kilian Voigts; Wolfgang Reng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty with simultaneous ACL reconstruction : treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis and cruciate ligament defect].

Authors:  M Tinius; T M Ecker; S Klima; W Tinius; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.918

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.