Literature DB >> 18810391

The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Ralf E Rosenberger1, Christian Fink, Sebastian Quirbach, Rene Attal, Katja Tecklenburg, Christian Hoser.   

Abstract

The success of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is highly dependent on the accuracy of the component alignment. Objective of the present study was to evaluate the immediate effect of image-free computer navigation technology on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive UKA. This study reviews 40 patients with primary isolated arthritis of the medial compartment of the knee that underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach. A cohort of the 20 most recent consecutive UKA's implanted with standard instrumentation was followed by a cohort of the very first 20 consecutive cases after conversion to the navigated technique. There was no variability regarding implant (Oxford meniscal unicompartmental knee system--Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana 46580, USA), surgeons and surgical technique, except for the use of the navigation system (Treon plus--Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, MI, USA). The axis alignment and accuracy of implant positioning was measured on postoperative long-leg standing radiographs and standard lateral X-rays with regard to the valgus angle and the coronal and sagittal component angle. In addition, preoperative deformities of the mechanical leg axis, tourniquet time, age, gender, and body mass index were correlated. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package. Optimal implant alignment including all measurements in the desired angular range was significantly (P=0.041) higher in the navigated cohort. Navigation eliminated outliers in the frontal mechanical alignment and coronal orientation of the femoral component totally and significantly (P<0.02). Furthermore, navigation narrowed the range of outliers in all other planes of component orientation. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean numerical values between the cohorts, except for the frontal mechanical alignment (P<0.009) and coronal tibial alignment (P<0.037). The average tourniquet time was increased by 10.95 min in the navigated cohort. Our results indicate that navigation immediately improves accuracy of bone cuts and reduces the number of outliers with implementation in UKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18810391     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0618-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Severe metallosis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Unicompartmental polycentric knee arthroplasty: description and preliminary results.

Authors:  M D Skolnick; R S Bryan; L F Peterson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.

Authors:  Y Kalairajah; A J Cossey; G M Verrall; G Ludbrook; A J Spriggins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

6.  The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age.

Authors:  Nanne P Kort; Jos J A M van Raay; Jim J van Horn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4-8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees.

Authors:  A Lindstrand; A Stenström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-06

8.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont; Margo McMahon; Phillip S Ragland; Mark Kester
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee.

Authors:  T Minas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  UniSpacer: insufficient data to support its widespread use.

Authors:  Richard D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative deformity on postoperative leg axis in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Robert Wen Wei Hsu; Yi-Jan Weng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Reliability of leg alignment using the OrthoPilot system depends on knee position: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; L Konstantinidis; P C Strohm; P Niemeyer; N P Suedkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Sagittal flexion angle of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is it same for both medial and lateral UKAs?

Authors:  Elcil Kaya Bicer; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Navigation of the tibial plateau alone appears to be sufficient in computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Frédéric Picard; Ramsay Refaie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Is tibial cut navigation alone sufficient in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Continuous series of fifty nine procedures.

Authors:  Thomas Gicquel; Jean Christophe Lambotte; Jean Louis Polard; Mickael Ropars; Denis Huten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Computerised navigation of unicondylar knee prostheses: from primary implantation to revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Benoit Marques Da Silva; Pierrick Dijoux; Jérémy Cognault; Julia Gaillot; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA).

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.

Authors:  Justin A M J van Leeuwen; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Huaming Xue; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Hui Zhang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.