Literature DB >> 20419454

Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Joby John1, C Mauffrey, Peter May.   

Abstract

We report the outcome of 94 Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee replacements done by a single surgeon over 16 years in a district general hospital in the UK. Patellofemoral arthritis was considered a contraindication only if symptomatic and confirmed on radiography and surgery. Deformity when present was correctable. The mean age at surgery was 66.54 years. The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (2-16 years). The mean Bristol knee score was 43.1 (28-50); 86% of the patients had good or excellent scores. The average range of flexion was 110.6° (80-130°); 89% of the knees had an appropriate alignment. Using revision as the endpoint, outcome for every knee was established. The survival rate for medial unicompartmental knee replacements was 94% at ten years and 87% at 15 years. Although the survival rate for the lateral unicompartmental knee replacement was 97% at five years, it dropped to 41% at eight years. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacements formed only 9.6% of all the replacements in this series. The results for medial unicompartmental knee replacements are similar to reports by other authors for similar and mobile bearing designs. Unicompartmental knee replacement results in a more kinematic knee and produces good functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419454      PMCID: PMC3066324          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Michael Bach; Michael Nogler; Iris Eva Steingruber; Michael Ogon; Cornelius Wimmer; Georg Göbel; Martin Krismer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; R L Evans; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

3.  Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements.

Authors:  A E Weale; O A Halabi; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J P McAuley; G A Engh; D J Ammeen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Yamina Chevrol-Benkeddache; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 3- to 10-year results in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Thomas R Perkins; Wayne Gunckle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital.

Authors:  C Rajasekhar; S Das; A Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-09

10.  Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis.

Authors:  Douglas Naudie; Jeff Guerin; David A Parker; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Survival of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Beom Han; Sang-Soo Lee; Kyoung-Ho Kim; Jung-Taek Im; Phil-Sun Park; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.