Literature DB >> 21997516

Characterizing the bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production.

Jasmin Sadat1, Clara D Martin, F Xavier Alario, Albert Costa.   

Abstract

Up to now, evidence on bilingual disadvantages in language production comes from tasks requiring single word retrieval. The present study aimed to assess whether there is a bilingual disadvantage in multiword utterances, and to determine the extent to which such effect is present in onset latencies, articulatory durations, or both. To do so, we tested two groups of Spanish speakers (monolinguals and early highly proficient bilinguals using their first and dominant language) each in two different production tasks: bare noun and noun phrase production. Onset latencies were longer for bilinguals relative to monolinguals in both production tasks. Regarding articulatory durations, we observed a clear bilingual disadvantage in noun phrase production and a strong tendency in bare noun production. These findings generalize the bilingual disadvantage in speech production to various performance measures (onset latency and articulatory duration of production) and beyond single words.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21997516     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-011-9183-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  32 in total

1.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Costa; M Miozzo; Y Bi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production.

Authors:  C T Kello; D C Plaut; B MacWhinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

3.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

4.  Vocabulary and verbal fluency of bilingual and monolingual college students.

Authors:  José S Portocarrero; Richard G Burright; Peter J Donovick
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Bilingual performance on the boston naming test: preliminary norms in Spanish and English.

Authors:  K J Kohnert; A E Hernandez; E Bates
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children.

Authors:  Ellen Bialystok; Gigi Luk; Kathleen F Peets; Sujin Yang
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2010-10

8.  Response latencies in naming objects.

Authors:  R C Oldfield; A Wingfield
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for the interpretation of word frequency effects.

Authors:  C E Wright
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-11

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Lying in a native and foreign language.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Albert Costa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  The Influence of Word Retrieval and Planning on Phonetic Variation: Implications for Exemplar Models.

Authors:  Angela Fink; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Linguist Vanguard       Date:  2015-04-07

3.  A switch is not a switch: Syntactically-driven bilingual language control.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using automated acoustic analysis to explore the link between planning and articulation in second language speech production.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Yosi Shrem; Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron; Cristina Baus; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production.

Authors:  Erin Gustafson; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production.

Authors:  Jasmin Sadat; Clara D Martin; James S Magnuson; François-Xavier Alario; Albert Costa
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-25

8.  Lifelong Reading Disorder and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Brian K Lebowitz; Cheryl Weinstein; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Sandford Auerbach; Rhoda Au
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages.

Authors:  Elin Runnqvist; Tamar H Gollan; Albert Costa; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-08-14

Review 10.  How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain?

Authors:  Albert Costa; Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.