Literature DB >> 11711927

Mandibular reconstruction using microvascular free flaps: a statistical analysis of 178 cases.

A Takushima1, K Harii, H Asato, T Nakatsuka, Y Kimata.   

Abstract

For this article, 178 consecutive cases of mandibular reconstruction using microvascular free flaps and performed from 1979 to 1997 were studied. The purpose of this report is to compare flap success rates, complications, and aesthetic and functional results. The ages of the 131 men and 47 women ranged from 13 to 85 years, with an average of 55 years. Donor sites included the rib (11 cases), radius (one case), ilium (36 cases), scapula (51 cases), fibula (34 cases), and soft-tissue flaps with implant (45 cases). Complications included total flap necrosis, partial flap necrosis, major fistula formation, and minor fistula formation. The rate of total flap necrosis involving the ilium and fibula was significantly higher than that of all other materials combined (p < 0.05). The overall rate of implant plate removal, which resulted from the exposure or fracture of the plate, was 35.6 percent (16 of 45 cases). Each mandibular defect was classified by the extent of the bony defect and by the extent of the soft-tissue defect. The extent of the mandibular bony defect was classified according to the HCL method of Jewer et al. The extent of the soft-tissue defect was classified into four groups: none, skin, mucosal, and through-and-through. According to these classifications, functional and aesthetic assessments of deglutition and contour were performed on 115 subjects, and speech was evaluated in 110. To evaluate the postoperative results, points were assigned to each assessment of deglutition, speech, and mandibular contour. Statistical analysis between pairs of bone-defect groups revealed that there was no significant difference in each category. Regarding deglutition, statistical analysis between pairs of soft-tissue-defect groups revealed there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the none and the mucosal groups and also between the none and the through-and-through groups. Regarding speech, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the none and the through-and-through groups. Regarding contour, there were significant differences (p < 0.01) between the none and the through-and-through groups and between the mucosal and the through-and-through groups. The points given for each function, depending on the reconstruction material, revealed that there was no significant difference between pairs of material groups. From this prospective study, the authors have developed an algorithm for oromandibular reconstruction. When the bony defect is lateral, the ilium, fibula, or scapula should be chosen as the donor site, depending on the extent of the soft-tissue defect. When the bony defect is anterior, the fibula is always the best choice. When the soft-tissue defect is extensive or through-and-through with an anterior bony defect, the fibula should be used with other soft-tissue flaps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711927     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Free fibula transfer. Analysis of 76 consecutive microsurgical procedures and review of the literature].

Authors:  D Erdmann; G A Giessler; G E O Bergquist; W Bruno; H Young; C Heitmann; L S Levin
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Strategies for avoiding complications with vascularized bone flaps in head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

Authors:  David A Mitchell; Stephen P R Macleod
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ken Omura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Composite mandibulectomy: a novel animal model.

Authors:  Douglas R Sidell; Tara Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis; Min Lee; Olga Bezouglaia; Adam DeConde; Maie A St John
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Lucy K Nagashima; Michelle Rondon-Newby; Ibrahim E Zakhary; William W Nagy; Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman; Mohammed E Elsalanty
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Deep circumflex iliac artery flap with osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of mandibular benign lesions: clinical experience of 33 cases.

Authors:  X Qu; C Zhang; W Yang; M Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  In situ formation of porous space maintainers in a composite tissue defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Allan M Henslee; Meng Shi; Simon Young; Nagi Demian; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Choice of osseous and osteocutaneous flaps for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Akihiko Takushima; Kiyonori Harii; Hirotaka Asato; Akira Momosawa; Mutsumi Okazaki; Takashi Nakatsuka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Palatomaxillary Reconstruction: Fibula or Scapula.

Authors:  Arvind K Badhey; Mohemmed N Khan
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  Reconstruction of canine mandibular bone defects using a bone transport reconstruction plate.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Ibrahim Zakhary; Sara Akeel; Byron Benson; Timothy Mulone; Gilbert R Triplett; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.