Literature DB >> 22241726

In situ formation of porous space maintainers in a composite tissue defect.

Patrick P Spicer1, James D Kretlow, Allan M Henslee, Meng Shi, Simon Young, Nagi Demian, John A Jansen, Mark E Wong, Antonios G Mikos, F Kurtis Kasper.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of composite defects involving bone and soft tissue presents a significant clinical challenge. In the craniofacial complex, reconstruction of the soft and hard tissues is critical for both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Constructs for space maintenance provide a template for soft tissue regeneration, priming the wound bed for a definitive repair of the bone tissue with greater success. However, materials used clinically for space maintenance are subject to poor soft tissue integration, which can result in wound dehiscence. Porous materials in space maintenance applications have been previously shown to support soft tissue integration and to allow for drug release from the implant to further prepare the wound bed for definitive repair. This study evaluated solid and low porosity (16.9% ± 4.1%) polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers fabricated intraoperatively and implanted in a composite rabbit mandibular defect model for 12 weeks. The data analyses showed no difference in the solid and porous groups both histologically, evaluating the inflammatory response at the interface and within the pores of the implants, and grossly, observing the healing of the soft tissue defect over the implant. These results demonstrate the potential of porous polymethylmethacrylate implants formed in situ for space maintenance in the craniofacial complex, which may have implications in the potential delivery of therapeutic drugs to prime the wound site for a definitive bone repair.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241726      PMCID: PMC3288442          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  32 in total

1.  Mandibular reconstruction using microvascular free flaps: a statistical analysis of 178 cases.

Authors:  A Takushima; K Harii; H Asato; T Nakatsuka; Y Kimata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Immediate reconstruction of gunshot injuries to the face.

Authors:  D R Finch; D G Dibbell
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1979-12

3.  Craniofacial traumas: immediate and delayed treatment.

Authors:  R Becelli; G Renzi; M Perugini; G Iannetti
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.

Authors:  S Saha; S Pal
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-04

5.  Experience with immediate and delayed mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  W Lawson; L J Loscalzo; S M Baek; H F Biller; Y P Krespi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Methyl methacrylate concentrations in tissues adjacent to bone cement.

Authors:  W Petty
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1980-07

7.  Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure.

Authors:  Luigi Chiarini; Sabina Figurelli; Giuseppe Pollastri; Elio Torcia; Francesca Ferrari; Massimo Albanese; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area.

Authors:  Marco L Bruens; Herman Pieterman; Joost R de Wijn; J Michael Vaandrager
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Histologic response to porous PMMA implant materials.

Authors:  D Nathanson; L Gettleman; P Schnitman; G Shklar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1978-01

10.  Temperature elevation after vertebroplasty with polymethyl-methacrylate in the goat spine.

Authors:  Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; F Cumhur Oner; Abraham J Verbout; Wouter J A Dhert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.368

View more
  9 in total

1.  A composite critical-size rabbit mandibular defect for evaluation of craniofacial tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Simon Young; Julia L Goldman; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Building bridges: leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs.

Authors:  Eliza L S Fong; Brendan M Watson; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 4.  Biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Esther J Lee; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Effects of Local Antibiotic Delivery from Porous Space Maintainers on Infection Clearance and Induction of an Osteogenic Membrane in an Infected Bone Defect.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Brandon T Smith; Alexander M Tatara; Eric R Molina; Esther J Lee; Trenton C Piepergerdes; Brent A Uhrig; Robert E Guldberg; George N Bennett; Joseph C Wenke; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Perspectives on the interface of drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Adam K Ekenseair; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  A rapid, flexible method for incorporating controlled antibiotic release into porous polymethylmethacrylate space maintainers for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  P M Mountziaris; S R Shah; J Lam; G N Bennett; A G Mikos
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 8.  Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone.

Authors:  Brianna M Roux; Ming-Huei Cheng; Eric M Brey
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Development and Characterization of a Rabbit Model of Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing.

Authors:  Stacey L Piotrowski; Lindsay Wilson; Neeraja Dharmaraj; Amani Hamze; Ashley Clark; Ramesh Tailor; Lori R Hill; Stephen Lai; F Kurtis Kasper; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.056

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.