| Literature DB >> 32390775 |
Arvind K Badhey1, Mohemmed N Khan1.
Abstract
Palatomaxillary reconstruction presents a unique challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The maxillofacial skeleton preserves critical aerodigestive functions-it provides a stable hard palate to support mastication and separate the nasal and oral cavities, and buttress support to provide adequate midface contour. Free tissue transfer has become a routine part of the reconstructive ladder in managing palatomaxillary defects. While there is a wide variety of options for bony reconstruction within the head and neck, the fibula and the scapula, and their variations, have become two of the most commonly used options for midface reconstruction. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both in specific regard to reconstruction of the palatomaxillary area. © Thieme Medical Publishers.Entities:
Keywords: fibula free flap; microvascular reconstruction; palatomaxillary reconstruction; scapula free flap
Year: 2020 PMID: 32390775 PMCID: PMC7202915 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Plast Surg ISSN: 1535-2188 Impact factor: 2.314