Literature DB >> 32390775

Palatomaxillary Reconstruction: Fibula or Scapula.

Arvind K Badhey1, Mohemmed N Khan1.   

Abstract

Palatomaxillary reconstruction presents a unique challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The maxillofacial skeleton preserves critical aerodigestive functions-it provides a stable hard palate to support mastication and separate the nasal and oral cavities, and buttress support to provide adequate midface contour. Free tissue transfer has become a routine part of the reconstructive ladder in managing palatomaxillary defects. While there is a wide variety of options for bony reconstruction within the head and neck, the fibula and the scapula, and their variations, have become two of the most commonly used options for midface reconstruction. This review will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both in specific regard to reconstruction of the palatomaxillary area. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fibula free flap; microvascular reconstruction; palatomaxillary reconstruction; scapula free flap

Year:  2020        PMID: 32390775      PMCID: PMC7202915          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  78 in total

1.  The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques.

Authors:  G I Taylor; G D Miller; F J Ham
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The free scapular flap with latissimus muscle reduces fistulas in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Tommy Wilkman; Jyrki Törnwall; Jyrki Vuola; Patrik Lassus
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Bone impacted fibular free flap: a novel technique to increase bone density for dental implantation in osseous reconstruction.

Authors:  Peter T Dziegielewski; Alex M Mlynarek; Jeffrey R Harris; Adam Hrdlicka; Brittany Barber; Khalid Al-Qahtani; John Wolfaardt; Don Raboud; Hadi Seikaly
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  D G Deschler; R E Hayden
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Total Maxillary Reconstruction With a Bi-Paddle Double-Barrel Osteocutaneous Fibular Flap and Arteriovenous Saphenous Loop After a Globe-Sparing Total Maxillectomy Due to Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Wan-Ling Tseng; Tzu-Yen Chang; Kuo-Shu Hung; Szu-Han Chen; Jenn-Ren Hsiao; Yao-Chou Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Midface reconstruction with the fibula free flap.

Authors:  Neal D Futran; Jeffrey Trad Wadsworth; Douglas Villaret; D Gregory Farwell
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-02

7.  Peripheral consideration in improving obturator retention.

Authors:  K E Brown
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Microvascular reconstruction of oncologic defects of the midface.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Thoracodorsal artery scapular tip autogenous transplant: vascularized bone with a long pedicle and flexible soft tissue.

Authors:  Douglas B Chepeha; Samir S Khariwala; Eric J P Chanowski; Justin W Zumsteg; Kelly M Malloy; Jeffrey S Moyer; Mark E Prince; Assuntina G Sacco; Julia S J Lee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10

10.  Temporalis myofascial flap for maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  C Colmenero; V Martorell; B Colmenero; I Sierra
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.