Literature DB >> 16136367

Choice of osseous and osteocutaneous flaps for mandibular reconstruction.

Akihiko Takushima1, Kiyonori Harii, Hirotaka Asato, Akira Momosawa, Mutsumi Okazaki, Takashi Nakatsuka.   

Abstract

Microvascular free flap transfer currently represents one of the most popular methods for mandibular reconstruction. With the various free flap options now available, there is a general consensus that no single kind of osseous or osteocutaneous flap can resolve the entire spectrum of mandibular defects. A suitable flap, therefore, should be selected according to the specific type of bone and soft tissue defect. We have developed an algorithm for mandibular reconstruction, in which the bony defect is termed as either "lateral" or "anterior" and the soft-tissue defect is classified as "none," "skin or mucosal," or "through-and-through." For proper flap selection, the bony defect condition should be considered first, followed by the soft-tissue defect condition. When the bony defect is "lateral" and the soft tissue is not defective, the ilium is the best choice. When the bony defect is "lateral" and a small "skin or mucosal" soft-tissue defect is present, the fibula represents the optimal choice. When the bony defect is "lateral" and an extensive "skin or mucosal" or "through-and-through" soft-tissue defect exists, the scapula should be selected. When the bony defect is "anterior," the fibula should always be selected. However, when an "anterior" bone defect also displays an "extensive" or "through-and-through" soft-tissue defect, the fibula should be used with other soft-tissue flaps. Flaps such as a forearm flap, anterior thigh flap, or rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap are suitable, depending on the size of the soft-tissue defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16136367     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-005-0504-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  75 in total

1.  Free vascularized fibula transfer: who was first?

Authors:  O K Coşkunfirat
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Further observations of the behavior of autogenous split-rib grafts in reconstruction of extensive defects of the cranium and face.

Authors:  J J LONGACRE; G A DESTEFANO
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)       Date:  1957-10

3.  The use of acrylic implants in one stage reconstruction of the mandible.

Authors:  M J HEALY; J L SUDBAY; H H NIEBEL; B M HOFFMAN; M K DUVAL
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1954-04

4.  The use of vitallium prostheses and implants in the reconstruction of the mandibular arch.

Authors:  J J CONLEY
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)       Date:  1951-08

5.  A composite operation for radical neck dissection and removal of cancer of the mouth.

Authors:  G E WARD; J O ROBBEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Immediate reconstruction of the mandible using a vascularized segment of radius.

Authors:  D S Soutar; W P Widdowson
Journal:  Head Neck Surg       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr

7.  The vascular anatomy and dissection of the free scapular flap.

Authors:  L F dos Santos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  D A Hidalgo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Application of microvascular free osteocutaneous flaps in the management of post-radiation recurrent oral cancer.

Authors:  I B Rosen; R T Manktelow; R M Zuker; B Boyd
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  A new method of oral reconstruction using a free composite foot flap.

Authors:  M S Bell; P T Barron
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Evaluation of individual ceramic implants made of Bioverit with CAD/CAM technology to reconstruct multidimensional craniofacial defects of the human skull].

Authors:  H Siebert; P Schleier; J Beinemann; W Fried; W Zenk; D Schumann
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-05

2.  Use of autologous scapula for cranioplasty: cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Mohammadali M Shoja; Frank Salter; E George Salter; W Jerry Oakes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Scapular free flap harvest site: recognising the spectrum of radiographic post-operative appearance.

Authors:  D K Powell; F Nwoke; M L Urken; D Buchbinder; A S Jacobson; J E Silberzweig; A S Khorsandi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The Management of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Maxillofacial Tumors.

Authors:  D Rolski; J Kostrzewa-Janicka; P Zawadzki; K Życińska; E Mierzwińska-Nastalska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Locoregional Flap Reconstruction Following Oromaxillofacial Oncologic Surgery in Dogs and Cats: A Review and Decisional Algorithm.

Authors:  Michel Guzu; Diego Rossetti; Philippe R Hennet
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-21

6.  Partial mandibulectomy without bony reconstruction in patients with oropharyngeal or mouth cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Schrom; Florian Bast; Stephan Knipping
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2019-09-04

7.  A case of effective oral rehabilitation after mandibular resection.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kataoka; Yuichi Akagi; Chie Kagawa; Ryo Sasaki; Toshihiro Okamoto; Tomohiro Ando
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.