Literature DB >> 21601342

Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.

Lucy K Nagashima1, Michelle Rondon-Newby, Ibrahim E Zakhary, William W Nagy, Uriel Zapata, Paul C Dechow, Lynne A Opperman, Mohammed E Elsalanty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone transport distraction osteogenesis provides a promising alternative to traditional grafting techniques. However, existing bone transport distraction osteogenesis devices have many limitations. The purpose of this research was to test a new device, the mandibular bone transport reconstruction plate, in an animal model with comparable mandible size to humans and to histologically and mechanically examine the regenerate bone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven adult foxhounds were divided into an unreconstructed control group of 5 animals and an experimental group of 6 animals. In each animal, a 34-mm segmental defect was created in the mandible. The defect was reconstructed with a bone transport reconstruction plate. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of the regenerate and unrepaired defect were analyzed and compared with bone on the contralateral side of the mandible after 4 weeks of consolidation.
RESULTS: The reconstructed defect was bridged with new bone, with little bone in the control defect. Regenerate density and microhardness were 22.3% and 42.6%, respectively, lower than the contralateral normal bone. Likewise, the anisotropy of the experimental group was statistically lower than in the contralateral bone. Half the experimental animals showed nonunion at the docking site.
CONCLUSION: The device was very stable and easy to install and activate. After 1 month of consolidation, the defect was bridged with new bone, with evidence of active bone formation. Regenerate bone was less mature than the control bone. Studies are underway to identify when the regenerate properties compare with normal bone and to identify methods to augment bone union at the docking site.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21601342      PMCID: PMC3181270          DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  49 in total

Review 1.  Osteogenic alveolar distraction: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jorge Cano; Julián Campo; Luis A Moreno; Antonio Bascones
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-10-12

2.  Prediction of biomechanical stability after callus distraction by high resolution scanning acoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Robert Hube; Hermann Mayr; Werner Hein; Kay Raum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Double-step transport osteogenesis in the reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects: a new surgical technique.

Authors:  Raúl González-García; Luis Naval-Gías; Pilar Rubio-Bueno; Francisco J Rodríguez-Campo; José L Gil-Díez Usandizaga
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Distraction osteogenesis and nonunion of the docking site: is there an ideal treatment option?

Authors:  Nikolaos Giotakis; Badri Narayan; Selvadurai Nayagam
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Three-point bending and acoustic emission study of adult rat femora after immobilization and free remobilization.

Authors:  Hanna Trebacz; Artur Zdunek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Reconstruction of large mandibular bone and soft-tissue defect using bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Taher N Taher; Ibrahim E Zakhary; Osama A Al-Shahaat; Mohammed Refai; Hatem A El-Mekkawi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Mandible reconstruction with transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Daniel Spagnoli
Journal:  Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09

8.  Mineralization and mechanical properties of the canine mandible distraction wound following acute molding.

Authors:  C Kunz; N Adolphs; P Büscher; B Hammer; B Rahn
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Internal distraction osteogenesis in mandibular reconstruction: clinical experience in 10 cases.

Authors:  Raúl González-Garcia; Pilar Rubio-Bueno; Luis Naval-Gías; Francisco J Rodríguez-Campo; Verónica Escorial-Hernández; Pedro L Martos; Mario F Muñoz-Guerra; Jesús Sastre-Pérez; José L Gil-Diez Usandizaga; Francisco J Diaz-González
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Microindentation in bone: hardness variation with five independent variables.

Authors:  Wesley M Johnson; Andrew J Rapoff
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.