Literature DB >> 10538383

Early experience and validation work with Procedicus VA--the Prosolvia virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy trainer.

S Smith1, A Wan, N Taffinder, S Read, R Emery, A Darzi.   

Abstract

Shoulder arthroscopy is a difficult procedure, commonly used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Until now, the majority of training has been done in theatre, assisting and practising under supervision. Few good simulations exist. Procedicus VA, from Prosolvia Clarus, is a virtual reality simulation of shoulder arthroscopy, with interactive graphics and haptic feedback. The simulator has various modes including anatomy manipulation pathology subacromial decompression. We describe our experience with the simulator, attempting to validate some of the scoring mechanisms, and highlighting some of the pitfalls discovered as the simulator is first trialled by surgeons. This early experience has highlighted both successful aspects of the simulator, and some of the initial pitfalls. Our initial experience confirms the need for close collaboration between virtual programmers and surgical trainers. We are revising the assessment criteria over the coming months.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10538383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

2.  Motion analysis.

Authors:  S G T Smith; J Torkington; T J Brown; N J Taffinder; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training.

Authors:  J B Cooper; V R Taqueti
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

Review 5.  The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education.

Authors:  Jesse Alan Slade Shantz; Jeff R S Leiter; Tania Gottschalk; Peter Benjamin MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The role of simulation in developing surgical skills.

Authors:  K S N Akhtar; Alvin Chen; N J Standfield; C M Gupte
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  Development and validation of assessment measures for a newly developed physical examination simulator.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Patricia Youngblood
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Identifying and reducing errors with surgical simulation.

Authors:  M P Fried; R Satava; S Weghorst; A G Gallagher; C Sasaki; D Ross; M Sinanan; J I Uribe; M Zeltsan; H Arora; H Cuellar
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

9.  Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency.

Authors:  Justin L Hodgins; Christian Veillette
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The Dimensionless Squared Jerk: An Objective Parameter That Improves Assessment of Hand Motion Analysis during Simulated Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Erica Kholinne; Maulik J Gandhi; Arnold Adikrishna; Hanpyo Hong; Haewon Kim; Jaesung Hong; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.