Literature DB >> 11684592

Junking science to promote tobacco.

D Yach1, S A Bialous.   

Abstract

Despite the tobacco industry's claims that it has changed its practices, the toll of tobacco-related disease and death continues to grow worldwide, and the industry continues to use a vast array of strategies to promote its products and increase profits. This commentary discusses the ways the tobacco industry has created controversy about risk assessment and about the scientific evidence of the health hazards of secondhand smoke. The authors recommend that policymakers be more vigilant and that they demand transparency about affiliations and linkages between allegedly independent scientists and tobacco companies. They also urge policymakers to be prepared for new and continuing challenges posed by the tobacco industry, because, despite the industry's claims, there is little evidence of fundamental change in its objectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684592      PMCID: PMC1446867          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Experts wrestle with social, ethical implications of human genome research.

Authors:  B Vastag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The ethics of the cash register: taking tobacco research dollars.

Authors:  S Chapman; S Shatenstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Academic relationships with industry: a new model for biomedical research.

Authors:  H Moses; J B Martin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy.

Authors:  N Francey; S Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

Review 5.  Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Safeguards at risk: John Graham and Corporate America's Back Door to the Bush White House Excerpts from a Public Citizen report.

Authors: 
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2001

7.  Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effects of passive smoking.

Authors:  M Perske
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis.

Authors:  N Hirschhorn; S A Bialous; S Shatenstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Junk science, tobacco, and agendas.

Authors:  Pat Hagen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  ILSI and the tobacco industry. International Life Sciences Institute.

Authors:  James Stanley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.

Authors:  L Trotter; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Thinking the "unthinkable": why Philip Morris considered quitting.

Authors:  E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine.

Authors:  S Tong; J Olsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Tobacco industry influence on the definition of tobacco related disorders by the American Psychiatric Association.

Authors:  M D Neuman; A Bitton; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.

Authors:  J E Cohen; M Zeller; T Eissenberg; M Parascandola; R O'Keefe; L Planinac; S Leischow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  "Working the system"--British American tobacco's influence on the European union treaty and its implications for policy: an analysis of internal tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Gary Fooks; Jeff Collin; Heide Weishaar; Sema Mandal; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.