Literature DB >> 16972502

The tobacco industry's response to the COMMIT Trial: an analysis of legacy tobacco documents.

Beatriz H Carlini1, Donaid L Patrick, Abigail C Halperin, Verena Santos.   

Abstract

We analyzed internal tobacco industry documents that describe the industry's response to the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), a multi-center community-based tobacco intervention project funded by the National Cancer Institute from 1988 to 1992. Our analysis of documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (www.legacy.library.ucsf.edu) suggests that the tobacco industry reacted to COMMIT by (1) closely monitoring trial activities, (2) confronting COMMIT in communities where it was most active, (3) distorting COMMIT findings on underage smoking data reported in the media, and (4) using COMMIT activities as practice to strengthen their attack against the subsequent ASSIST trial, falsely accusing both studies of illegal political lobbying with taxpayers' money. The tobacco industry closely monitored COMMIT activities and organized local responses to findings and activities perceived as threatening to the industry's public image or interests. Although we could not document a concerted attack by the tobacco industry that impacted the results of the COMMIT trial, data suggest that the industry used COMMIT as a learning opportunity to mount a well orchestrated and potentially damaging response to the larger American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention Trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16972502      PMCID: PMC1564446          DOI: 10.1177/003335490612100504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  17 in total

Review 1.  Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.

Authors:  Lisa Bero
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 4.  "We are anxious to remain anonymous": the use of third party scientific and medical consultants by the Australian tobacco industry, 1969 to 1979.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes.

Authors:  W M K Trochim; F A Stillman; P I Clark; C L Schmitt
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist.

Authors:  N Fields; S Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Tobacco industry surveillance of public health groups: the case of STAT (Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco) and INFACT (Infant Formula Action Coalition).

Authors:  Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.

Authors:  Katherine Bryan-Jones; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Elisa K Tong; Lucinda England; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Public health under attack: the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Jenny White; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.