Literature DB >> 11678156

The negative response of the flash electroretinogram in glaucoma.

C Cursiefen1, M Korth, F K Horn.   

Abstract

The existence of a negative ERG component following the b-wave has been known for a long time. Recently, in unilateral macaque experimental glaucoma, a negative response in flash electroretinograms under scotopic as well as photopic conditions has been shown to be greatly reduced or absent compared to the healthy fellow eye. The aim of this pilot study was to test whether a late negative electroretinogram component is reduced also in human glaucoma patients under different stimulus conditions. Dark-adapted ganzfeld flash electroretinograms were recorded after 30 min of dark using two test conditions, obtained as optimal in pilot studies on controls. Under the scotopic condition I white Xenon-flashes of intensity 0.53 Log photopic Td s were presented on a low white background of 1.38 Log scotopic Td. Under the more photopic condition II orange flashes of intensity -0.37 Log photopic Td s were presented on a blue-adapting background of 2.5 Log scotopic Td. Nine controls and 18 patients with advanced glaucoma were analyzed. The amplitude of the negative response was not significantly reduced in glaucoma patients (condition I: -28.5+/-23.7 microV; condition II: -25.2+/-19.7 microV) compared to controls (condition I: -41.4+/-36.6 microV; condition II: -31.3+/-26.2 microV). The peak latency of the responses under condition I and II did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Thus, the late negative electroretinogram component in ganzfeld flash electroretinograms obtained under scotopic and more photopic conditions does not seem to distinguish as easy between human controls and glaucoma patients as animal experiments suggest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11678156     DOI: 10.1023/a:1017539018387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  17 in total

1.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE B-WAVE IN THE HUMAN ERG.

Authors:  A TROELSTRA; N M SCHWEITZER
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1963 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SINGLE FLASH ERG AND THE ERG ELICITED BY MORE COMPLEX STIMULI.

Authors:  A TROELSTRA; N M SCHWEITZER
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1964       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  A NEGATIVE COMPONENT IN THE B-WAVE OF THE HUMAN ERG.

Authors:  N M SCHWEITZER; A TROELSTRA
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  [Electroretinography in glaucoma].

Authors:  J FRANCOIS
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1953

5.  Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat.

Authors:  P A Sieving; L J Frishman; R H Steinberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  [The electroretinogram and the visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Bartl
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-09-11

7.  The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  L J Frishman; F F Shen; L Du; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith; L Carter-Dawson; M L Crawford
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Scotopic threshold response and scotopic PII in glaucoma.

Authors:  M Korth; N X Nguyen; F Horn; P Martus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Electroretinographic changes in controlled chronic open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  D L Alvis
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Barbara Cvenkel; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  MfERG responses to long-duration white stimuli in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Margarita G Todorova; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Retinal ganglion cell activity from the multifocal electroretinogram in pig: optic nerve section, anaesthesia and intravitreal tetrodotoxin.

Authors:  Mélanie R Lalonde; Balwantray C Chauhan; François Tremblay
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Kristina Gottschalk; Christian Y Mardin; Gobinda Pangeni; Anselm G Jünemann; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects.

Authors:  Nina Wakili; Folkert K Horn; Anselm G Jünemann; Nhung X Nguyen; Christian Y Mardin; Matthias Korth; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Ganglion cell contributions to the rat full-field electroretinogram.

Authors:  Bang V Bui; Brad Fortune
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Photopic Negative Response of Flash Electroretinography in Ganglion Cell Complex Assessment in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Hasan Awwad; Ossama Nada; Momen Mahmoud Hamdi; Amany Abd El-Fattah El-Shazly; Sheriff Elwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Marta Kirkiewicz; Wojciech Lubiński; Krzysztof Penkala
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.