Literature DB >> 21267627

On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Folkert K Horn1, Kristina Gottschalk, Christian Y Mardin, Gobinda Pangeni, Anselm G Jünemann, Jan Kremers.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest a diagnostic value of the photopic negative response (PhNR) with a long-duration stimulus. The aim of this study was to record the on and off responses of the photopic fullfield electroretinogram (ERG) in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. We focused on different waves of the responses after onset and offset of the long-duration stimulus ERG. Photopic fullfield ERGs were recorded in response to a white bright LED flash on a white 20 cd/m(2) background. Stimulus luminances were 40, 60 and 80 cd/m(2). Responses were averaged using a flash duration of 240 ms and an offset period of 500 ms. We examined 19 healthy subjects, 27 patients with glaucomatous optic disc atrophy and 7 ocular hypertensive patients. The amplitudes and implicit times of the on and off responses of the human ERG depended on flash luminance. Comparing patients with glaucoma and healthy subjects for the 60 cd/m² flash, there was a significant change in the PhNRs (at onset: P < 0.01, at offset: P < 0.001) of the d-wave and of the i-wave at offset (P < 0.01). No significant difference was found for peak times of the fullfield ERG and for a- and b-wave amplitudes. PhNR amplitudes were significantly correlated with mean thickness of retinal nerve fibre layer as measured with OCT. In comparison with the normal photopic long-flash ERG, glaucoma patients showed changes in the PhNR amplitude following stimulus onset and in waves following stimulus offset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21267627     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9258-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  31 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; S Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hongling Chen; Dezheng Wu; Shizhou Huang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  N Drasdo; Y H Aldebasi; Z Chiti; K E Mortlock; J E Morgan; R V North
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  The negative ERG: clinical phenotypes and disease mechanisms of inner retinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Isabelle Audo; Anthony G Robson; Graham E Holder; Anthony T Moore
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update).

Authors:  M F Marmor; A B Fulton; G E Holder; Y Miyake; M Brigell; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Gotoh; Shigeki Machida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

9.  Comparing the photopic ERG i-wave in different species.

Authors:  Serge G Rosolen; Florence Rigaudière; Jean-François LeGargasson; Catherine Chalier; Marianne Rufiange; Julie Racine; Sandrine Joly; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.644

10.  Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Nina Wakili; Anselm M Jünemann; Matthias Korth
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  17 in total

1.  On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Gobinda Pangeni; Robert Lämmer; Ralf P Tornow; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Electoretinographic evidence of retinal ganglion cell-dependent function in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pantea Moghimi; Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Linda K McLoon; Theoden I Netoff; Michael S Lee; Angus MacDonald; Robert F Miller
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Characteristics of late negative ERG responses elicited by sawtooth flicker.

Authors:  Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Mohamed A Genead; Anastasios Anastasakis; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Comparison of the uniform-field electroretinogram and the pattern electroretinogram to checkerboard and bar gratings.

Authors:  Alexander J Lingley; Ange-Lynca Kantungane; Stuart G Coupland
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Photopic negative response in diagnosis of glaucoma: an experimental study in glaucomatous rabbit model.

Authors:  Amal A ElGohary; Laila Hassan M Elshazly
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Asymmetric Functional Impairment of ON and OFF Retinal Pathways in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Alan W Kong; Marcus L Turner; Hoover Chan; Robert L Stamper; Benjamin F Arnold; Luca Della Santina; Yvonne Ou
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  Preferential Loss of Contrast Decrement Responses in Human Glaucoma.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; Alexandra Yakovleva; Naz Jehangir; Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

9.  Full-field electroretinogram response to increment and decrement stimuli.

Authors:  Eric Vukmanic; Kate Godwin; Pan Shi; Alan Hughes; Paul DeMarco
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Muscle contraction and relaxation-response time in response to on or off status of visual stimulus.

Authors:  Kengo Yotani; Hiroki Nakamoto; Sachi Ikudome; Atsumu Yuki
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.