Literature DB >> 21340609

MfERG responses to long-duration white stimuli in glaucoma patients.

Margarita G Todorova1, Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe.   

Abstract

The intent of our study was to evaluate whether the response to a long-duration white stimulus in the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is sufficiently sensitive to detect early retinal dysfunction in glaucoma. On-off mfERGs were recorded from 15 NTG and 15 HTG patients and compared with 14 control subjects. Recording parameters were the following: LED stimulus screen (RETIscan™), 100-ms stimulus duration, 200-ms stimulus interval, 11-min total recording time, stimulus matrix of 61 elements, frame rate: 70 Hz, Lmax: 180 cd/m(2), Lmin: 0 cd/m(2), and filter setting: 1-200 Hz. The second negative response following stimulus onset (N2-on), as well as following stimulus offset (N2-off), was analyzed as an overall response and in quadrants, as well as in 4 small central and four adjoining peripheral areas per quadrant. The latency of the N2-on was significantly delayed in HTG in all response averages tested, while in NTG this was only seen in the overall response and in the small central response averages (P < 0.05). The most sensitive measure in HTG was the latency of the N2-on of the small peripheral response average of the superior temporal quadrant with an area under the ROC curve of 0.881. For NTG, the most representative measure was the latency of the N2-on of the small central response average of the inferior nasal quadrant with an area under the ROC curve of 0.793. Our results showed that in stimulation with long-duration flashes, the second negative response following the on response, representative of the early PhNR, is affected in glaucoma where N2-on showed a latency delay in POAG patients. The latency delay of the N2-on was more prominent for HTG than for NTG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21340609     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9263-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  36 in total

1.  The multifocal ERG in open angle glaucoma--a comparison of high and low contrast recordings in high- and low-tension open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  A M Palmowski; R Allgayer; B Heinemann-Vemaleken
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Assessment of local cone on- and off-pathway function using multifocal ERG technique.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shimada; Marcus A Bearse; Erich E Sutter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  M Araie
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Slow-stimulated multifocal ERG in high- and normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe; Reiner J Allgayer; Bernhild Vernaleken; Andy Schötzau; Klaus W Ruprecht
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  An attempt to detect glaucomatous damage to the inner retina with the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  D C Hood; V C Greenstein; K Holopigian; R Bauer; B Firoz; J M Liebmann; J G Odel; R Ritch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  A Colotto; B Falsini; T Salgarello; G Iarossi; M E Galan; L Scullica
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  S-cone, L + M-cone, and pattern, electroretinograms in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Authors:  Yousef H Aldebasi; Neville Drasdo; James E Morgan; Rachel V North
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  4 in total

1.  Structural and functional changes in glaucoma: comparing the two-flash multifocal electroretinogram to optical coherence tomography and visual fields.

Authors:  Anna A Ledolter; Matthias Monhart; Andreas Schoetzau; Margarita G Todorova; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Continuous-wavelet-transform analysis of the multifocal ERG waveform in glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  J M Miguel-Jiménez; R Blanco; L De-Santiago; A Fernández; J M Rodríguez-Ascariz; R Barea; J L Martín-Sánchez; C Amo; E Sánchez-Morla; L Boquete
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Novel Machine-Learning Based Framework Using Electroretinography Data for the Detection of Early-Stage Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mohan Kumar Gajendran; Landon J Rohowetz; Peter Koulen; Amirfarhang Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Is multifocal electroretinography an early predictor of glaucoma?

Authors:  Haydar Gölemez; Nilgün Yıldırım; Ahmet Özer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.