Literature DB >> 18273658

The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects.

Nina Wakili1, Folkert K Horn, Anselm G Jünemann, Nhung X Nguyen, Christian Y Mardin, Matthias Korth, Jan Kremers.   

Abstract

The photopic negative response of the flash-electroretinogram driven by the middle- and long-wavelength cones has been shown to be reduced in non-human primates with experimental glaucoma and in human patients with glaucoma. The photopic negative response for the blue-sensitive response has been studied using a blue-green silent-substitution-technique on a red background. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the value of the photopic negative response of the blue-sensitive pathway in glaucoma using a conventional flash-electroretinogram. In 37 eyes of 37 controls (age: 53 +/- 13.6 years) and 37 eyes of 37 patients with open-angle glaucoma of different perimetric visual field defects (age: 58.3 +/- 10 years; MD: 11.7 +/- 6.7 dB) of the Erlangen glaucoma registry Ganzfeld flash-electroretinograms (LKC, UTAS 3000) were recorded using blue Xenon-flashes of increasing photopic luminance (0.013, 0.018, 0.030, and 0.052 cd s/m(2); 440 nm) on a bright yellow background (238 cd/m(2); 550 nm) after 2 min of light adaptation. Amplitudes and implicit times of the photopic negative response and of L&amp;M-cone- and S-cone-driven b-waves were compared between glaucomas and controls for all flash energies (unpaired t-test). The amplitudes of the photopic negative response were significantly reduced in glaucoma patients for all flash energies (P < 0.001). The implicit times of L&amp;M-cone-driven b-wave (0.013, 0.018, 0.030, and 0.052 cd s/m(2)) and S-cone-driven b-wave (0.030 and 0.052 cd s/m(2)) were significantly prolonged in glaucoma patients (P < 0.05). The changes in these implicit times, however, are very small (1.5 ms or less). The other measures did not differ significantly. The amplitude of the photopic negative response and the implicit times of the L&amp;M-cone and S-cone b-wave in the same responses of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram are potentially useful in the evaluation of inner-retinal function in glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18273658     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9116-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  27 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; S Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  N Drasdo; Y H Aldebasi; Z Chiti; K E Mortlock; J E Morgan; R V North
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat.

Authors:  P A Sieving; L J Frishman; R H Steinberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  [The electroretinogram and the visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Bartl
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-09-11

6.  The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  L J Frishman; F F Shen; L Du; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith; L Carter-Dawson; M L Crawford
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Electroretinographic changes in controlled chronic open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  D L Alvis
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  The b-wave of the dark adapted flash electroretinogram in patients with advanced asymmetrical glaucoma and normal subjects.

Authors:  I M Velten; F K Horn; M Korth; K Velten
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  A Colotto; B Falsini; T Salgarello; G Iarossi; M E Galan; L Scullica
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  11 in total

1.  Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Jan Kremers; Mounira Jertila; Barbara Link; Gobinda Pangeni; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  [Electrophysiological examination methods in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  C M Poloschek; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Barbara Cvenkel; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Kristina Gottschalk; Christian Y Mardin; Gobinda Pangeni; Anselm G Jünemann; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Blue flash ERG PhNR changes associated with poor long-term glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Michelle McFarlane; Tom Wright; Derek Stephens; Josefin Nilsson; Carol A Westall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Time-Frequency Analysis of ERG With Discrete Wavelet Transform and Matching Pursuits for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marc Sarossy; Jonathan Crowston; Dinesh Kumar; Anne Weymouth; Zhichao Wu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Allogeneic Transplantation of Müller-Derived Retinal Ganglion Cells Improves Retinal Function in a Feline Model of Ganglion Cell Depletion.

Authors:  Silke Becker; Karen Eastlake; Hari Jayaram; Megan F Jones; Robert A Brown; Gillian J McLellan; David G Charteris; Peng T Khaw; G Astrid Limb
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Blue-on-Green Flash Induces Maximal Photopic Negative Response and Oscillatory Potential and Serves as a Diagnostic Marker for Glaucoma in Rat Retina.

Authors:  Su Jin Park; Sun Sook Paik; Ji-Yeon Lee; Su-Ja Oh; In-Beom Kim
Journal:  Exp Neurobiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.261

10.  A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response.

Authors:  Jessica Tang; Flora Hui; Xavier Hadoux; Marc Sarossy; Peter van Wijngaarden; Michael Coote; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.