Literature DB >> 11605106

Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication.

G B Cadière1, J Himpens, M Vertruyen, J Bruyns, O Germay, G Leman, R Izizaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic surgical approach has proven its benefit for the patient. There are however several shortcomings, which have triggered considerable research for improvement. One improvement may be the introduction of telesurgery by the interposition of a computer interface between surgeon and patient.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted in an advanced laparoscopic procedure, Nissen fundoplication. The control group underwent the conventional laparoscopic approach, while the investigational group underwent the telesurgical approach.
RESULTS: Feasibility was 100%. The procedure was more time consuming in the Telesurgical group, at all stages of the operation. Mortality was nil and morbidity was comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The telesurgical approach is feasible in advanced laparoscopic procedures like Nissen fundoplication. At the present time there is however no obvious added benefit from this new technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605106     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  [Some technical and instrumental references for gynecologic laparoscopy].

Authors:  K Kolmorgen
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1989

2.  Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Himpens; G Leman; G B Cadiere
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Margossian; A Garcia-Ruiz; T Falcone; J M Goldberg; M Attaran; J H Miller; M Gagner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  [Cholecystectomy with celioscopy. 330 cases].

Authors:  F Dubois; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1990

5.  Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  A Garcia-Ruiz; N G Smedira; F D Loop; J F Hahn; J H Miller; C P Steiner; M Gagner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Development of steerable instruments for minimal invasive surgery in modular conception.

Authors:  M O Schurr; A Melzer; P Dautzenberg; B Neisius; R Trapp; G Buess
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.090

7.  How to avoid esophageal perforation while performing laparoscopic dissection of the hiatus.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; J Bruyns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Nissen fundoplication done by remotely controlled robotic technique].

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; M Vertruyen; J Bruyns; G Fourtanier
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1999

9.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis.

Authors:  H Margossian; A Garcia-Ruiz; T Falcone; J M Goldberg; M Attaran; M Gagner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Image rotation and reversal--major obstacles in learning intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying.

Authors:  M Medina
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  44 in total

1.  Technique evolution, learning curve, and outcomes of 200 robot-assisted gastric bypass procedures: a 5-year experience.

Authors:  Vivek Bindal; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Mario Masrur; Enrique F Elli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Robotic gastric banding in children and adolescents: a comparative study.

Authors:  Aayed Alqahtani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.

Authors:  G Hubens; H Coveliers; L Balliu; M Ruppert; W Vaneerdeweg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Early results of one-year robotic surgery using the Da Vinci system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud; Patrick Boissel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

9.  Safety and learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Adam Abodeely; Jorge A Lagares-Garcia; Vincent Duron; Matthew Vrees
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-20

10.  A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyu-Seog Choi; In Ja Park; Byung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.