Literature DB >> 27638756

Safety and learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.

Adam Abodeely1, Jorge A Lagares-Garcia2, Vincent Duron3, Matthew Vrees1.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery has recently started to be used for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Because of limited access and high cost, very few colorectal units are available in the US. We describe our experience with benign and malignant disease since September 2008 in a dedicated colorectal practice. A prospective collected robotic database was queried for colon and rectal procedures. Anonymized demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data, and pathology information, were collected and analyzed. A total of 48 robotic procedures for colorectal maladies were performed in the study period. There were 35 females and 13 males. The average age was 57 years. Twenty-two cases were performed for diverticulitis, 13 for malignancy (10 distal rectum (<8 cm anal verge), two rectosigmoid, and one ascending colon cancer), 10 for rectal prolapse, two for rectovaginal fistula, and one for incidental appendiceal mucocele found during a gynecologic resection. The average operating room time (OR) was 162 min and there were no conversions to open procedures. Blood loss averaged 104 mL. Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 5.4 days. Patient readmission occurred in 27.3% of cases. The anastamotic leak rate was 2.1% (one patient). No mortalities were reported. When the analysis was performed for colorectal malignancies (13 procedures), there were nine females and four males. Average age was 59 years. The mean OR time was 191.1 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 123 mL and there were no conversions to open surgery. Average LOS was 7.0 days. There was one anastamotic leak (7.7%). The length of stay was increased for the patient with anastamotic leak (18 days) and for a patient with high stoma output and postoperative ileus (17 days). Readmission rate was 30.1%. The total number of lymph nodes retrieved averaged 19.5, with a mean distal margin of 3.0 cm and in all cases negative radial margins. Robotic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease is safe, and short-term outcomes are comparable with those of traditional and laparoscopic surgery. Oncologic resections were adequate with excellent lymph node sampling and radial and distal margins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Robotic colorectal surgery; Safety

Year:  2010        PMID: 27638756     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0204-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  19 in total

1.  Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease.

Authors:  Philip A Weber; Stephen Merola; Annette Wasielewski; Garth H Ballantyne
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Risk factors for, and management of anastomotic leakage in rectal surgery.

Authors:  B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 4.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Benhidjeb; S Anders; B Schicke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; O Germay; R Izizaw; M Degueldre; J Vandromme; E Capelluto; J Bruyns
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Benjamin Paz; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

9.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robotic rectal cancer surgery: technique of abdomino-perineal resection.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-09

Review 3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: towards defining criteria to the right choice.

Authors:  Matthew Zelhart; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure.

Authors:  Ovunc Bardakcioglu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

5.  The robotic learning curve for a newly appointed colorectal surgeon.

Authors:  Sabah Uddin Saqib; Muhammad Zeeshan Raza; Charles Evans; Adeel Ahmad Bajwa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-03-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.