Literature DB >> 9453871

Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft.

A Garcia-Ruiz1, N G Smedira, F D Loop, J F Hahn, J H Miller, C P Steiner, M Gagner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopically sutured vascular anastomoses are complex, time consuming, and require great dexterity. We decided to evaluate performance enhancement using a robotic device to create sutured coronary artery bypass anastomoses with endoscopic techniques in a plastic model.
METHODS: Seven coronary artery bypass anastomoses were endoscopically created in a plastic model using a robotic enhancement technology (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA). Anastomoses were created with a single running suture (7-0 monofilament). Our endpoints were operative time, intraoperative incidents, stability and dexterity of the robotic system, surgeon's fatigue, and anastomotic patency.
RESULTS: Operative time was 46+/-12 min (mean+/-SD). There were no intraoperative incidents. Patency was confirmed in all anastomoses. The system's stability and dexterity were high. Surgeon's fatigue was mild.
CONCLUSION: The use of robotic enhancement technology leads to an efficient performance of sutured coronary artery bypass anastomoses in a plastic model. The robotic device enhances dexterity, precision, and reduces surgeon's fatigue while preserving the quality of hand suturing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9453871     DOI: 10.1089/lap.1997.7.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; M Vertruyen; J Bruyns; O Germay; G Leman; R Izizaw
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Status of robotic assistance--a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery?

Authors:  H G Kenngott; L Fischer; F Nickel; J Rom; J Rassweiler; B P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery--the past, present status and the future.

Authors:  Shi-ping Luh; Hui-ping Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  Robotic surgery of the kidney and ureter in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jason P Van Batavia; Pasquale Casale
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Prospective clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary grafting with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  S M Prasad; C T Ducko; E R Stephenson; C E Chambers; R J Damiano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Joel Leroy; Francesco Rubino; Michelle Smith; Michel Vix; Michele Simone; Didier Mutter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart.

Authors:  Roberto P Casula; Thanos Athanasiou; Ashok Cherian; Ross Bacon; Rodney Foale; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 9.  Principles and advantages of robotics in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Renda; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Leonardo Villegas; Sandhya Lagoo; Ted Schwartz; Nina Athar; Rebecca Greene; W Steve Eubanks
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.