Literature DB >> 9617965

Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study.

H Margossian1, A Garcia-Ruiz, T Falcone, J M Goldberg, M Attaran, J H Miller, M Gagner.   

Abstract

As with standard microsurgical procedures performed at laparotomy, laparoscopic tubal anastomosis requires great dexterity. Handling fine suture materials under magnification to anastomose tubal segments with lumens less than 3 mm in diameter while working with your hands at a distance from the tissue makes these fine movements even more difficult. This is exacerbated by the tremor induced by the fatigue caused by a prolonged laparoscopic procedure and the need for precise control. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of performing laparoscopic tubal anastomosis with robotic assistance in a live porcine model. Two anastomoses were performed on one uterine horn via each of the following techniques: laparoscopy, laparoscopy with robotic assistance, and open microsurgery. Immediate necropsy demonstrated all the anastomoses to be patent. There were no intraoperative complications. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis was associated with surgeon fatigue and neck, shoulder, and back pain. The surgeons were more comfortable performing the procedure with robotic assistance. The device functioned well and without incident. This acute animal study suggests that robotic assistance in laparoscopic tubal anastomoses is safe and feasible. It enhances surgeons' dexterity and precision while reducing fatigue. It is promising for future use in chronic experimental studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617965     DOI: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; M Vertruyen; J Bruyns; O Germay; G Leman; R Izizaw
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic assisted microsurgical vasal reconstruction in a model system.

Authors:  Richard A Schoor; Lawrence Ross; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Application of robotics in adnexal surgery.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Antonio R Gargiulo; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

4.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A single surgeon concurrent cohort review.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Brusabhanu Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-01

5.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Leonardo Villegas; Sandhya Lagoo; Ted Schwartz; Nina Athar; Rebecca Greene; W Steve Eubanks
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Efficacy and safety of a new single-port model for appendectomy: Experimental study on swine.

Authors:  José Gustavo Olijnyk; Paulo Walter Ferreira; Miguel Prestes Nácul; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.