Literature DB >> 11599639

Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.

A H Doughty1, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

A multiple chained schedule was used to compare the relative resistance to change of variable and fixed four-peck response sequences in pigeons. In one terminal link, a response sequence produced food only if it occurred infrequently relative to 15 other response sequences (vary). In the other terminal link, a single response sequence produced food (repeat). Identical variable-interval schedules operated in the initial links. During baseline, lower response rates generally occurred in the vary initial link, and similar response and reinforcement rates occurred in each terminal link. Resistance of responding to prefeeding and three rates of response-independent food delivered during the intercomponent intervals then was compared between components. During each disruption condition, initial- and terminal-link response rates generally were more resistant in the vary component than in the repeat component. During the response-independent food conditions, terminal-link response rates were more resistant than initial-link response rates in each component, but this did not occur during prefeeding. Variation (in vary) and repetition (in repeat) both decreased during the response-independent food conditions in the respective components, but with relatively greater disruption in repeat. These results extend earlier findings demonstrating that operant variation is more resistant to disruption than is operant repetition and suggest that theories of response strength, such as behavioral momentum theory, must consider factors other than reinforcement rate. The implications of the results for understanding operant response classes are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11599639      PMCID: PMC1284834          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  Stability and variability in extinction.

Authors:  A Neuringer; N Kornell; M Olufs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-01

2.  Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S Holland; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.

Authors:  R C Mellon; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning.

Authors:  J J ANTONITIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-10

8.  Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule.

Authors:  L Cohen; A Neuringer; D Rhodes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavioral momentum: the effects of the temporal separation of rates of reinforcement.

Authors:  S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Scott T Gaynor; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.

Authors:  Yosuke Hachiga; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Adam H Doughty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Variation, repetition, and choice.

Authors:  Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Kennon A Lattal; Cristiano V dos Santos; Ricardo A Matos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Resistance to change and preference for variable versus fixed response sequences.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Mark E Berg; Dien Le; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Operant variability: a conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Lourenço de Souza Barba
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.