Literature DB >> 11199517

Stability and variability in extinction.

A Neuringer1, N Kornell, M Olufs.   

Abstract

Some studies have found that extinction leaves response structures unaltered; others have found that response variability is increased. Responding by Long-Evans rats was extinguished after 3 schedules. In one, reinforcement depended on repetitions of a particular response sequence across 3 operanda. In another, sequences were reinforced only if they varied. In the third, reinforcement was yoked: not contingent upon repetitions or variations. In all cases, rare sequences increased during extinction--variability increased--but the ordering of sequence probabilities was generally unchanged, the most common sequences during reinforcement continuing to be most frequent in extinction. The rats' combination of generally doing what worked before but occasionally doing something very different may maximize the possibility of reinforcement from a previously bountiful source while providing necessary variations for new learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11199517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  26 in total

1.  Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.

Authors:  A H Doughty; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Scott T Gaynor; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Learning to vary and varying to learn.

Authors:  Alicia Grunow; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

5.  Response variability in pigeons in a Pavlovian task.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Michael E Young; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  History effects on induced and operant variability.

Authors:  Alessandra da Silva Souza; Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Ana Amélia Baumann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Resurgence of integrated behavioral units.

Authors:  Gustavo Bachá-Méndez; Alliston K Reid; Adela Mendoza-Soylovna
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A novel strategy for dissecting goal-directed action and arousal components of motivated behavior with a progressive hold-down task.

Authors:  Matthew R Bailey; Greg Jensen; Kathleen Taylor; Chris Mezias; Cait Williamson; Rae Silver; Eleanor H Simpson; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.