Literature DB >> 20455261

Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons.

Hongyi Zhou1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

In this work, we develop a method called fragment comparison and the template comparison (FTCOM) for assessing the global quality of protein structural models for targets of medium and hard difficulty (remote homology) produced by structure prediction approaches such as threading or ab initio structure prediction. FTCOM requires the C(alpha) coordinates of full length models and assesses model quality based on fragment comparison and a score derived from comparison of the model to top threading templates. On a set of 361 medium/hard targets, FTCOM was applied to and assessed for its ability to improve on the results from the SP(3), SPARKS, PROSPECTOR_3, and PRO-SP(3)-TASSER threading algorithms. The average TM-score improves by 5-10% for the first selected model by the new method over models obtained by the original selection procedure in the respective threading methods. Moreover, the number of foldable targets (TM-score >or= 0.4) increases from least 7.6% for SP(3) to 54% for SPARKS. Thus, FTCOM is a promising approach to template selection. Proteins 2010. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455261      PMCID: PMC2868272          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  39 in total

Review 1.  Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis.

Authors:  J Skolnick; J S Fetrow; A Kolinski
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

Authors:  J Lundström; L Rychlewski; J Bujnicki; A Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ginalski; Arne Elofsson; Daniel Fischer; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Fold recognition methods.

Authors:  Adam Godzik
Journal:  Methods Biochem Anal       Date:  2003

7.  3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor.

Authors:  Daniel Fischer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-05-15

8.  SPARKS 2 and SP3 servers in CASP6.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

9.  Performance of the Pro-sp3-TASSER server in CASP8.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Shashi B Pandit; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

10.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  12 in total

1.  Template-based protein structure modeling using TASSER(VMT.).

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates.

Authors:  Yuedong Yang; Eshel Faraggi; Huiying Zhao; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  A simple recipe for the non-expert bioinformaticist for building experimentally-testable hypotheses for proteins with no known homologs.

Authors:  Alexander Zawaira; Youtaro Shibayama
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-09-07

4.  OMPcontact: An Outer Membrane Protein Inter-Barrel Residue Contact Prediction Method.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Han Wang; Lun Yan; Lingtao Su; Dong Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity.

Authors:  Ariel Fernández; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Incorporation of local structural preference potential improves fold recognition.

Authors:  Yun Hu; Xiaoxi Dong; Aiping Wu; Yang Cao; Liqing Tian; Taijiao Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Phosphorylation by PINK1 releases the UBL domain and initializes the conformational opening of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin.

Authors:  Thomas R Caulfield; Fabienne C Fiesel; Elisabeth L Moussaud-Lamodière; Daniel F A R Dourado; Samuel C Flores; Wolfdieter Springer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Transmembrane protein alignment and fold recognition based on predicted topology.

Authors:  Han Wang; Zhiquan He; Chao Zhang; Li Zhang; Dong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The PINK1 p.I368N mutation affects protein stability and ubiquitin kinase activity.

Authors:  Maya Ando; Fabienne C Fiesel; Roman Hudec; Thomas R Caulfield; Kotaro Ogaki; Paulina Górka-Skoczylas; Dariusz Koziorowski; Andrzej Friedman; Li Chen; Valina L Dawson; Ted M Dawson; Guojun Bu; Owen A Ross; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Wolfdieter Springer
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 14.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.