Literature DB >> 11579184

Why sex selection should be legal.

D McCarthy1.   

Abstract

Reliable medically assisted sex selection which does not involve abortion or infanticide has recently become available, and has been used for non-medical reasons. This raises questions about the morality of sex selection for non-medical reasons. But reasonable people continue to disagree about the answers to these questions. So another set of questions is about what the law should be on medically assisted sex selection for non-medical reasons in the face of reasonable disagreement about the morality of sex selection. This paper sketches a way of thinking about what the law should be, and concludes, contrary to what the law is in many places, that medically assisted sex selection for non-medical reasons ought to be legal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11579184      PMCID: PMC1733446          DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.5.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

1.  The reproductive option of sex selection.

Authors:  J L Simpson; S A Carson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Gender selection: a crime against humanity or the exercise of a fundamental right?

Authors:  C Sureau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Health care and the prospective Pareto principle.

Authors:  Allan Gibbard
Journal:  Ethics       Date:  1984-01

4.  Sex selection: the case for.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  E F Fugger; S H Black; K Keyvanfar; J D Schulman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  XY sperm separation for sex selection.

Authors:  J H Batzofin
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Long-term effects of embryo freezing in mice.

Authors:  E Dulioust; K Toyama; M C Busnel; R Moutier; M Carlier; C Marchaland; B Ducot; P Roubertoux; M Auroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  J R Bowen; F L Gibson; G I Leslie; D M Saunders
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Social aspects of > 800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children.

Authors:  P Liu; G A Rose
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos.

Authors:  U B Wennerholm; K Albertsson-Wikland; C Bergh; L Hamberger; A Niklasson; L Nilsson; K Thiringer; M Wennergren; M Wikland; M P Borres
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Making sense of child welfare when regulating human reproductive technologies.

Authors:  John McMillan
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Son Preference of Immigrants to the United States: Data from U.S. Birth Certificates, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Huanjun Zhang; Dudley L Poston
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-06

4.  Response to: A rational cure for pre-reproductive stress syndrome.

Authors:  S Aksoy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.