Literature DB >> 10326534

Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

J R Bowen1, F L Gibson, G I Leslie, D M Saunders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced as a new form of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) in 1993 and is now accepted as the treatment of choice for severe male infertility in many centres around the world. However, there is little information about the long-term outcome of children conceived by ICSI. We aimed to find out the medical and developmental outcome of children conceived by ICSI at age 1 year.
METHODS: In this prospective study, we compared the medical and developmental outcome at 1 year of 89 children conceived by ICSI with 84 children conceived by routine IVF, and with 80 children conceived naturally. Formal developmental assessment was done with Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd edition) from which a mental development index (MDI) was derived.
FINDINGS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of major congenital malformations or major health problems in the first year of life. However, the mean Bayley MDI was significantly lower for the children conceived by ICSI than for the children conceived by routine IVF or naturally (95.9 [SD 10.7], 101.8 [8.5], and 102.5 [7.6], respectively, p < 0.0001). 15 (17%) of 89 children conceived by ICSI experienced mildly or significantly delayed development (MDI < 85) at 1 year compared with two (2%) of the 84 children conceived by IVF and one (1%) of the 80 children conceived by natural conception (p < 0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: Although most children conceived by ICSI are healthy and develop normally, there is an increased risk of mild delays in development at 1 year when compared with children conceived by routine IVF or conceived naturally. These findings support the need for ongoing developmental follow-up of children conceived by ICSI to see whether they are at increased risk of intellectual impairment or learning difficulties at school age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10326534     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10168-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  28 in total

1.  Children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: population control study.

Authors:  A G Sutcliffe; B Taylor; J Li; S Thornton; J G Grudzinskas; B A Lieberman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-13

2.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and other aspects of new reproductive technologies.

Authors:  A G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Why sex selection should be legal.

Authors:  D McCarthy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Effects of in vitro maturation on gene expression in rhesus monkey oocytes.

Authors:  Young S Lee; Keith E Latham; Catherine A Vandevoort
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 5.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)--what are the risks?

Authors:  Joseph P Alukal; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Infertility treatment and children's longitudinal growth between birth and 3 years of age.

Authors:  E H Yeung; R Sundaram; E M Bell; C Druschel; C Kus; Y Xie; G M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Author reply: To PMID 23151857.

Authors:  Eleni Leze; Loretta Thomaidis; Sophia Kitsiou-Tzeli; Emmanouel Kanavakis
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.764

10.  Cognitive development following ART: effect of choice of comparison group, confounding and mediating factors.

Authors:  C Carson; J J Kurinczuk; A Sacker; Y Kelly; R Klemetti; M Redshaw; M A Quigley
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.