Literature DB >> 15289529

Response to: A rational cure for pre-reproductive stress syndrome.

S Aksoy1.   

Abstract

This response to "A rational cure for pre-reproductive stress syndrome" first suggests it is existence that is essential and prerequisite to everything good or bad, therefore it deserves to be protected and respected. Secondly, it argues that every life is worth living, even if it is worse than some other lives, if the only alternative is non-existence. Finally, it takes a critical view of and challenges Häyry's suggestion that in a good clinical situation, the idea of the irrationality of having children could be a legitimate part of the guidance given, since it is not the counsellor's or doctor's duty to advise a couple who wish to have children that it is irrational or even immoral to bring a child into life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289529      PMCID: PMC1733895          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Why sex selection should be legal.

Authors:  D McCarthy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome.

Authors:  M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome--a perspective from Israel: a rejoinder to Häyry, Bennet, Holm, and Aksoy.

Authors:  F Simonstein
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome revisited.

Authors:  M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.