Literature DB >> 16983516

Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

E Dahl1, M Beutel, B Brosig, S Grüssner, Y Stöbel-Richter, H-R Tinneberg, Elmar Brähler.   

Abstract

Preconception sex selection for nonmedical reasons is one of the most controversial issues in bioethics today. The most powerful objection to social sex selection is based on the assumption that it may severely distort the natural sex ratio and lead to a socially disruptive imbalance of the sexes. Based on representative social surveys conducted in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, this paper argues that the fear of an impending sex ratio distortion is unfounded. Given the predominant preference for a "gender balanced family," a widely available service for social sex selection is highly unlikely to upset the balance of the sexes in Western societies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983516     DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9064-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  48 in total

1.  The hidden cost of sex selection.

Authors:  Gail Vines
Journal:  New Sci       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 0.319

2.  Gender selection for nonmedical indications.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vishvanath Karande
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany.

Authors:  U Meister; C Finck; Y Stöbel-Richter; G Schmutzer; E Brähler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Sex selection: the case for.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Scientific aspects of preconception gender selection.

Authors:  Joseph D Schulman; David S Karabinus
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Male or female, we will create them: the ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons.

Authors:  David Heyd
Journal:  Ethical Perspect       Date:  2003

7.  Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Sex preselection in New York City: who chooses which sex and why.

Authors:  M A Khatamee; A Leinberger-Sica; P Matos; A C Weseley
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct

9.  Procreative liberty: the case for preconception sex selection.

Authors:  Edgar Dahl
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Preference for sex of child among primiparous women.

Authors:  R Steinbacher; F D Gilroy
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1985-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  What Israeli policy can teach us about elective sex selection.

Authors:  Gila Leiter
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-12-18

3.  Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections.

Authors:  G de Wert; W Dondorp
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010

4.  Children's Sex and the Happiness of Parents.

Authors:  Rachel Margolis; Mikko Myrskyla
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  2016-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.