Literature DB >> 10590728

Sex selection: the case for.

J Savulescu1.   

Abstract

There is a strong argument in favour of sex selection, based on respect for procreative autonomy--the autonomy of couples to decide for themselves how to procreate, and what children to have. Objections based on possible harm to the child, the parents, or society, are not compelling, particularly in Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10590728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN： 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  10 in total

1.  Why sex selection should be legal.

Authors:  D McCarthy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Consequentialism without consequences: ethics and embryo research.

Authors:  Sarah Chan; John Harris
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for elective sex selection, the IVF market economy, and the child--another long day's journey into night?

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Gianpiero D Palermo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person.

Authors:  R J Boyle; J Savulescu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

Review 6.  The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection.

Authors:  S Matthew Liao
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Persons and their parts: new reproductive technologies and risks of commodification.

Authors:  Heather Widdows
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-01-09

Review 8.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

9.  Justice in the context of family balancing.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".

Authors:  Arianne Shahvisi
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.352
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.