Literature DB >> 115191

Optimal body size and an animal's diet.

T J Case.   

Abstract

Within many animal taxa there is a trend for the species of larger body size to eat food of lower caloric value. For example, most large extant lizards are herbivorous. Reasonable arguments based on energetic considerations are often invoked to explain this trend, yet, while these factors set limits to feasible body size, they do not in themselves mathematically produce optimum body sizes. A simple optimization model is developed here which considers food search, capture, and eating rates and the metabolic cost of these activities for animals of different sizes. The optimization criterion is defined as the net calorie gain a consumer accrues per day. This model does produce an optimum intermediate body size which increases with food quality--not the reverse. This discrepancy is accounted for, however, because the model also predicts that body size should be even more sensitive to increases in food abundance. In nature, many poor quality foods are also relatively abundant foods, hence the consumers eating them may maximize their daily energetic profit by evolving a relatively large body size. Optimum consumer body size also decreases with increases in consumer metabolic rate and "prey" speed.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 115191     DOI: 10.1007/bf00054680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biotheor        ISSN: 0001-5342            Impact factor:   1.774


  10 in total

1.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Relation between Ecology a Social Structure in Primates.

Authors:  J F Eisenberg; N A Muckenhirn; R Rundran
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in the terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 5.  Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running.

Authors:  K Schmidt-Nielsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park.

Authors:  M D Gwynne; R H Bell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K Schmidt-Nielsen; J L Raab
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-10

8.  Selection in populations with overlapping generations. I. The use of Malthusian parameters in population genetics.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 9.  Mammals in which females are larger than males.

Authors:  K Ralls
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.875

10.  Running up and down hills: some consequences of size.

Authors:  C R Taylor; S L Caldwell; V J Rowntree
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Tempo of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification.

Authors:  Samantha A Price; Samantha S B Hopkins; Kathleen K Smith; V Louise Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants.

Authors:  Iain J Gordon; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus, Leiocephalus of the Bahamas.

Authors:  Thomas W Schoener; Jennifer B Slade; Christopher H Stinson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Ecological consequences of body size: a model for patch choice in desert rodents.

Authors:  Mary V Price
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Experimental evidence for interactive habitat segregation between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) in a shallow eutrophic lake.

Authors:  L Johansson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Energetic tradeoffs control the size distribution of aquatic mammals.

Authors:  William Gearty; Craig R McClain; Jonathan L Payne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces).

Authors:  Håkan Sand; Göran Cederlund; Kjell Danell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Functional anatomy of a giant toothless mandible from a bird-like dinosaur: Gigantoraptor and the evolution of the oviraptorosaurian jaw.

Authors:  Waisum Ma; Junyou Wang; Michael Pittman; Qingwei Tan; Lin Tan; Bin Guo; Xing Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.