Literature DB >> 29581289

Energetic tradeoffs control the size distribution of aquatic mammals.

William Gearty1, Craig R McClain2, Jonathan L Payne3.   

Abstract

Four extant lineages of mammals have invaded and diversified in the water: Sirenia, Cetacea, Pinnipedia, and Lutrinae. Most of these aquatic clades are larger bodied, on average, than their closest land-dwelling relatives, but the extent to which potential ecological, biomechanical, and physiological controls contributed to this pattern remains untested quantitatively. Here, we use previously published data on the body masses of 3,859 living and 2,999 fossil mammal species to examine the evolutionary trajectories of body size in aquatic mammals through both comparative phylogenetic analysis and examination of the fossil record. Both methods indicate that the evolution of an aquatic lifestyle is driving three of the four extant aquatic mammal clades toward a size attractor at ∼500 kg. The existence of this body size attractor and the relatively rapid selection toward, and limited deviation from, this attractor rule out most hypothesized drivers of size increase. These three independent body size increases and a shared aquatic optimum size are consistent with control by differences in the scaling of energetic intake and cost functions with body size between the terrestrial and aquatic realms. Under this energetic model, thermoregulatory costs constrain minimum size, whereas limitations on feeding efficiency constrain maximum size. The optimum size occurs at an intermediate value where thermoregulatory costs are low but feeding efficiency remains high. Rather than being released from size pressures, water-dwelling mammals are driven and confined to larger body sizes by the strict energetic demands of the aquatic medium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammalia; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck; body mass; metabolism; phylogenetic comparative methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581289      PMCID: PMC5910812          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712629115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; Tamar Dayan; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Christy McCain; Jordan G Okie; Juha J Saarinen; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolution toward a new adaptive optimum: phenotypic evolution in a fossil stickleback lineage.

Authors:  Gene Hunt; Michael A Bell; Matthew P Travis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod.

Authors:  Simon J Braddy; Markus Poschmann; O Erik Tetlie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Energetic constraints, size gradients, and size limits in benthic marine invertebrates.

Authors:  Kenneth P Sebens
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Examining predator-prey body size, trophic level and body mass across marine and terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Marlee A Tucker; Tracey L Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Animal evolution. Cope's rule in the evolution of marine animals.

Authors:  Noel A Heim; Matthew L Knope; Ellen K Schaal; Steve C Wang; Jonathan L Payne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  How big should a mammal be? A macroecological look at mammalian body size over space and time.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; S Kathleen Lyons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Cope's rule and the evolution of body size in Pinnipedimorpha (Mammalia: Carnivora).

Authors:  Morgan Churchill; Mark T Clementz; Naoki Kohno
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Metabolic expenditures of lunge feeding rorquals across scale: implications for the evolution of filter feeding and the limits to maximum body size.

Authors:  Jean Potvin; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Robert E Shadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics.

Authors:  Graham J Slater; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Nicholas D Pyenson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  20 in total

1.  The scale of life and its lessons for humanity.

Authors:  Matthew G Burgess; Steven D Gaines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Physiological constraints on marine mammal body size.

Authors:  J A Goldbogen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fast and Furious: Energetic Tradeoffs and Scaling of High-Speed Foraging in Rorqual Whales.

Authors:  William T Gough; David E Cade; Max F Czapanskiy; Jean Potvin; Frank E Fish; Shirel R Kahane-Rapport; Matthew S Savoca; K C Bierlich; David W Johnston; Ari S Friedlaender; Andy Szabo; Lars Bejder; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  Anthropogenic disruptions to longstanding patterns of trophic-size structure in vertebrates.

Authors:  Rob Cooke; William Gearty; Abbie S A Chapman; Jillian Dunic; Graham J Edgar; Jonathan S Lefcheck; Gil Rilov; Craig R McClain; Rick D Stuart-Smith; S Kathleen Lyons; Amanda E Bates
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 19.100

5.  The whale shark genome reveals how genomic and physiological properties scale with body size.

Authors:  Jessica A Weber; Seung Gu Park; Victor Luria; Sungwon Jeon; Hak-Min Kim; Yeonsu Jeon; Youngjune Bhak; Je Hun Jun; Sang Wha Kim; Won Hee Hong; Semin Lee; Yun Sung Cho; Amir Karger; John W Cain; Andrea Manica; Soonok Kim; Jae-Hoon Kim; Jeremy S Edwards; Jong Bhak; George M Church
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  City limits: Heat tolerance is influenced by body size and hydration state in an urban ant community.

Authors:  Dustin J Johnson; Zachary R Stahlschmidt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Size does matter: Parallel evolution of adaptive thermal tolerance and body size facilitates adaptation to climate change in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Muhammed Elayadeth-Meethal; Aravindakshan Thazhathu Veettil; Shane K Maloney; Nichola Hawkins; Tom H Misselbrook; Veerasamy Sejian; M Jordana Rivero; Michael R F Lee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Effects of body plan evolution on the hydrodynamic drag and energy requirements of swimming in ichthyosaurs.

Authors:  Susana Gutarra; Benjamin C Moon; Imran A Rahman; Colin Palmer; Stephan Lautenschlager; Alison J Brimacombe; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The multi-peak adaptive landscape of crocodylomorph body size evolution.

Authors:  Pedro L Godoy; Roger B J Benson; Mario Bronzati; Richard J Butler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Decomposing the effects of ocean environments on predator-prey body-size relationships in food webs.

Authors:  Tomoya Dobashi; Midori Iida; Kazuhiro Takemoto
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.