Literature DB >> 28306886

Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces).

Håkan Sand1, Göran Cederlund1, Kjell Danell2.   

Abstract

We examined the geographical pattern in growth and adult body size among 14 populations of Swedish moose (Alces alces) using data from 4,294 moose (≥1.5 years old) killed during the hunting season in 1989-1992. In both sexes, adult body mass was significantly positively correlated with latitude. Moose in northern populations had a 15-20% larger adult body mass than moose in the south. Juvenile body mass was correlated with neither latitude nor adult body mass. Thus, variation in time (years) and rate of body growth after the juvenile stage were responsible for most of the variation in adult body mass among populations. Moose in northern populations grew for approximately 2 more years of life than southern moose. In contrast to adult body mass, skeletal size (measured as jawbone length) was not correlated with latitude, suggesting that variation in adult body mass was primarily due to differences in fat reserves. Discrimination between population characteristics, such as moose density, climate, and the amount of browse available to moose, showed climatic harshness to be the most important variable explaining geographical variation in body mass among populations. The results support the notion that in mammals body size increases with latitude in accordance with Bergmann's rule. We conclude that (1) variation in patterns of growth after the juvenile stage is the main cause of the latitudinal trend in adult body size in moose, and (2) climatic conditions are a more important factor than population density and availability of food in explaining geographical variation in growth patterns and adult body mass between populations of Swedish moose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alces alces; Bergmann's rule; Growth and body size; Latitudinal variation; Life-history variation

Year:  1995        PMID: 28306886     DOI: 10.1007/BF00341355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Optimal body size and an animal's diet.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.774

2.  Darwin's finches and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in body size.

Authors:  J R Downhower
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  PHYLOGENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION OF THE POCKET MOUSE PEROGNATHUS GOLDMANI OSGOOD.

Authors:  Donald O Straney; James L Patton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS: PREDICTIONS OF REACTION NORMS FOR AGE AND SIZE AT MATURITY.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Jacob C Koella
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Relationships between body size and some life history parameters.

Authors:  L Blueweiss; H Fox; V Kudzma; D Nakashima; R Peters; S Sams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  BERGMANN'S RULE, SEASONALITY, AND GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN BODY SIZE OF HOUSE SPARROWS.

Authors:  Edward C Murphy
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  BODY SIZES OF POIKILOTHERM VERTEBRATES AT DIFFERENT LATITUDES.

Authors:  C C Lindsey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  BERGMANN'S RULE AND CLIMATIC ADAPTATION IN WOODRATS (NEOTOMA).

Authors:  James H Brown; Anthony K Lee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer.

Authors:  Terje Skogland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Optimum body sizes at different ambient temperatures: an energetics explanation of Bergmann's Rule.

Authors:  W A Searcy
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  20 in total

1.  Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose.

Authors:  Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether; Magnar Lillegård; Erling J Solberg; Steinar Engen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Mathieu Garel; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions.

Authors:  Håkan Sand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reproductive success and failure: the role of winter body mass in reproductive allocation in Norwegian moose.

Authors:  Jos M Milner; Floris M van Beest; Erling J Solberg; Torstein Storaas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effects of population density on juvenile growth rate in white-tailed deer.

Authors:  Brannon Barr; Steve Wolverton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Ecological correlates and determinants in the geographical variation of deer morphology.

Authors:  Chisato Terada; Shirow Tatsuzawa; Takashi Saitoh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Moose body mass variation revisited: disentangling effects of environmental conditions and genetics.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Hallvard Haanes; Erling J Solberg; Knut H Røed; Kjell Arild Høgda; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Seasonal and geographic variation in packed cell volume and selected serum chemistry of platypuses.

Authors:  Jana Stewart; Gilad Bino; Tahneal Hawke; Richard T Kingsford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Saether; Kjell Arild Høgda; Reidar Andersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Snout shape in extant ruminants.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Norman MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.