Literature DB >> 28313974

The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants.

Iain J Gordon1, Andrew W Illius2.   

Abstract

The allometric relationships for the fermentation rate of dry matter, the total energy concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), the energy supplied from VFA production and the mass of the digesta contents within the rumen or caecum and proximal colon (hindgut) were used to test whether the digestive strategies of grazing and browsing African ruminants differ. The wet and dry mass of the contents of the rumen and hindgut were allometrically related to body mass (BM). These relationships did not differ between browsing and grazing ruminants. The fermentation rates in the rumen were strongly allometric and the intercepts of the relationships did not differ between browsers and grazers. The fermentation rates in the hindgut were not allometrically related to BM and did not differ between ruminants with different feeding habits. Likewise, the total energy concentration of the VFAs in the rumen and hindgut showed no allometric scaling and did not differ between browsing and grazing ruminants. The energy supplied by VFA production in both the rumen and hindgut of African ruminants scaled at around 0.8 with BM. Only in the case of the energy supplied by VFAs in the rumen were there significantly different intercepts for browsing and grazing ruminants. The energy supplied by VFA production in the rumen was inadequate to meet the energy requirements for maintenance of browsers and small grazers. The retention time of digesta in the alimentary tract was positively related to BM although there was no difference in the allometric relationships for grazers and browsers. The results of these analyses suggest that, after controlling for the effects of body mass, there is little difference in digestive strategy between African ruminants with different morphological adaptations of the gut.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Digestive strategy; Feeding habits; Retention time; Rumen

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313974     DOI: 10.1007/BF00341469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Optimal body size and an animal's diet.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.774

2.  Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system.

Authors:  R R Hofmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Molar proportions of volatile fatty acids in the gastrointestinal tract of East African wild ruminants.

Authors:  E T Clemens; G M Maloiy; J D Sutton
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1983

4.  The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 3. The digestion of microbial amino and nucleic acids in, and losses of endogenous nitrogen from, the small intestine of sheep.

Authors:  E Storm; D S Brown; E R Orskov
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Estimation of stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets.

Authors:  M R Murphy; R L Baldwin; L J Koong
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Simultaneous measurements of the rates of production of acetic, propionic and butyric acids in the rumen of sheep on different diets and the correlation between production rates and concentrations of these acids in the rumen.

Authors:  R A Leng; D J Brett
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  J A Milne; J C Macrae; A M Spence; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Ration digestion and retention times of digesta in domestic cattle (Bos taurus), American bison (Bison bison), and Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens).

Authors:  A L Schaefer; B A Young; A M Chimwano
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.597

9.  Passage and digestibility of lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay in Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and sheep under restricted feeding.

Authors:  K Katoh; Y Kajita; M Odashima; M Ohta; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  Dynamics of digestion in cattle, sheep, goats and deer.

Authors:  J E Huston; B S Rector; W C Ellis; M L Allen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  15 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gregariousness increases brain size in ungulates.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Barbería; Iain J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Higher masseter muscle mass in grazing than in browsing ruminants.

Authors:  Marcus Clauss; Reinold R Hofmann; W Jürgen Streich; Jörns Fickel; Jürgen Hummel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies.

Authors:  Johan T du Toit; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dietary innovations spurred the diversification of ruminants during the Caenozoic.

Authors:  Juan L Cantalapiedra; Richard G Fitzjohn; Tyler S Kuhn; Manuel Hernández Fernández; Daniel DeMiguel; Beatriz Azanza; Jorge Morales; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Adaptation of ruminants to browse and grass diets: are anatomical-based browser-grazer interpretations valid?

Authors:  Charles T Robbins; Donald E Spalinger; Wouter van Hoven
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell; Emma Sherratt; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Forager size and ecology of Acromyrmex coronatus and other leaf-cutting ants in Costa Rica.

Authors:  James K Wetterer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Nutritional ecology of dimorphic herbivores: digestion and passage rates in Nubian ibex.

Authors:  John E Gross; Philip U Alkon; Montague W Demment
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Inferences of diplodocoid (Sauropoda: Dinosauria) feeding behavior from snout shape and microwear analyses.

Authors:  John A Whitlock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.