Literature DB >> 12712314

The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

M Clauss1, R Frey, B Kiefer, M Lechner-Doll, W Loehlein, C Polster, G E Rössner, W J Streich.   

Abstract

An oft-cited nutritional advantage of large body size is that larger animals have lower relative energy requirements and that, due to their increased gastrointestinal tract (GIT) capacity, they achieve longer ingesta passage rates, which allows them to use forage of lower quality. However, the fermentation of plant material cannot be optimized endlessly; there is a time when plant fibre is totally fermented, and another when energy losses due to methanogenic bacteria become punitive. Therefore, very large herbivores would need to evolve adaptations for a comparative acceleration of ingesta passage. To our knowledge, this phenomenon has not been emphasized in the literature to date. We propose that, among the extant herbivores, elephants, with their comparatively fast passage rate and low digestibility coefficients, are indicators of a trend that allowed even larger hindgut fermenting mammals to exist. The limited existing anatomical data on large hindgut fermenters suggests that both a relative shortening of the GIT, an increase in GIT diameter, and a reduced caecum might contribute to relatively faster ingesta passage; however, more anatomical data is needed to verify these hypotheses. The digestive physiology of large foregut fermenters presents a unique problem: ruminant-and nonruminant-forestomachs were designed to delay ingesta passage, and they limit food intake as a side effect. Therefore, with increasing body size and increasing absolute energy requirements, their relative capacity has to increase in order to compensate for this intake limitation. It seems that the foregut fermenting ungulates did not evolve species in which the intake-limiting effect of the foregut could be reduced, e.g. by special bypass structures, and hence this digestive model imposed an intrinsic body size limit. This limit will be lower the more the natural diet enhances the ingesta retention and hence the intake-limiting effect. Therefore, due to the mechanical characteristics of grass, grazing ruminants cannot become as big as the largest browsing ruminant. Ruminants are not absent from the very large body size classes because their digestive physiology offers no particular advantage, but because their digestive physiology itself intrinsically imposes a body size limit. We suggest that the decreasing ability for colonic water absorption in large grazing ruminants and the largest extant foregut fermenter, the hippopotamus, are an indication of this limit, and are the outcome of the competition of organs for the available space within the abdominal cavity. Our hypotheses are supported by the fossil record on extinct ruminant/tylopod species which did not, with the possible exception of the Sivatheriinae, surpass extant species in maximum body size. In contrast to foregut fermentation, the GIT design of hindgut fermenters allows adaptations for relative passage acceleration, which explains why very large extinct mammalian herbivores are thought to have been hindgut fermenters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12712314     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone?

Authors:  C M Janis; J Damuth; J M Theodor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Optimal body size and an animal's diet.

Authors:  T J Case
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  Morphology of the intestinal tract in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum).

Authors:  H Endo; T Morigaki; M Fujisawa; D Yamagiwa; M Sasaki; J Kimura
Journal:  Anat Histol Embryol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.114

4.  The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants.

Authors:  Iain J Gordon; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions.

Authors:  A W Illius; I J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Megaherbivores influence trophic guilds structure in African ungulate communities.

Authors:  Hervé Fritz; Patrick Duncan; Iain J Gordon; Andrew W Illius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Differences in selective reticulo-ruminal particle retention as a key factor in ruminant diversification.

Authors:  Marcus Clauss; Matthias Lechner-Doll
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Studies on feed digestibilities in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus).

Authors:  M Clauss; W Loehlein; E Kienzle; H Wiesner
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.130

9.  Vertical zonation of browse quality in tree canopies exposed to a size-structured guild of African browsing ungulates.

Authors:  A Woolnough; J du Toit
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Colonic absorption and secretion of fluids, electrolytes and organic acids in East African wild ruminants.

Authors:  E T Clemens; G M Moloiy
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1984
View more
  36 in total

1.  Effects of body size on the diurnal activity budgets of African browsing ruminants.

Authors:  J T du Toit; C A Yetman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Artiodactyl 'success' over perissodactyls in the late Palaeogene unlikely to be related to the carotid rete: a commentary on Mitchell & Lust (2008).

Authors:  Christine Janis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Longer in the tooth, shorter in the record? The evolutionary correlates of hypsodonty in Neogene ruminants.

Authors:  P Raia; F Carotenuto; J T Eronen; M Fortelius
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Biology of the sauropod dinosaurs: the evolution of gigantism.

Authors:  P Martin Sander; Andreas Christian; Marcus Clauss; Regina Fechner; Carole T Gee; Eva-Maria Griebeler; Hanns-Christian Gunga; Jürgen Hummel; Heinrich Mallison; Steven F Perry; Holger Preuschoft; Oliver W M Rauhut; Kristian Remes; Thomas Tütken; Oliver Wings; Ulrich Witzel
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-02

5.  Mammal body size evolution in North America and Europe over 20 Myr: similar trends generated by different processes.

Authors:  Shan Huang; Jussi T Eronen; Christine M Janis; Juha J Saarinen; Daniele Silvestro; Susanne A Fritz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  No evidence for directional evolution of body mass in herbivorous theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  Lindsay E Zanno; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Does diet influence salivary enzyme activities in elephant species?

Authors:  Carolin Boehlke; Sandra Pötschke; Verena Behringer; Christian Hannig; Oliver Zierau
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  How big should a mammal be? A macroecological look at mammalian body size over space and time.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; S Kathleen Lyons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Assembly of modern mammal community structure driven by Late Cretaceous dental evolution, rise of flowering plants, and dinosaur demise.

Authors:  Meng Chen; Caroline A E Strömberg; Gregory P Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The spatial distribution of African savannah herbivores: species associations and habitat occupancy in a landscape context.

Authors:  T Michael Anderson; Staci White; Bryant Davis; Rob Erhardt; Meredith Palmer; Alexandra Swanson; Margaret Kosmala; Craig Packer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.