Literature DB >> 11516950

Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans.

S Kennett1, M Taylor-Clarke, P Haggard.   

Abstract

Research on sensory perception now often considers more than one sense at a time. This approach reflects real-world situations, such as when a visible object touches us. Indeed, vision and touch show great interdependence: the sight of a body part can reduce tactile target detection times [1], visual and tactile attentional systems are spatially linked [2], and the texture of surfaces that are actively touched with the fingertips is perceived using both vision and touch [3]. However, these previous findings might be mediated by spatial attention [1, 2] or by improved guidance of movement [3] via visually enhanced body position sense [4--6]. Here, we investigate the direct effects of viewing the body on passive touch. We measured tactile two-point discrimination thresholds [7] on the forearm while manipulating the visibility of the arm but holding gaze direction constant. The spatial resolution of touch was better when the arm was visible than when it was not. Tactile performance was further improved when the view of the arm was magnified. In contrast, performance was not improved by viewing a neutral object at the arm's location, ruling out improved spatial orienting as a possible account. Controls confirmed that no information about the tactile stimulation was provided by visibility of the arm. This visual enhancement of touch may point to online reorganization of tactile receptive fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11516950     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00327-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  115 in total

1.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Albertine Visser; Merle E Bredero; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand.

Authors:  Erin L Austen; Salvador Soto-Faraco; James T Enns; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

Authors:  George A Michael; Marie-Agnès Dupuy; Amélie Deleuze; Margaux Humblot; Bilitys Simon; Janick Naveteur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Touch used to guide action is partially coded in a visual reference frame.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Introduction to special issue on body representation: feeling, seeing, moving and observing.

Authors:  Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Studying plasticity of sensory function: insight from pregnancy.

Authors:  Y Perez-Borrego; V Soto-Leon; J Aguilar; G Foffani; M Rotondi; S Bestmann; A Oliviero
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.