Literature DB >> 15883807

Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Bettina Forster1, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

Several behavioural studies have shown that directing one's gaze at a body part reduces detection speed and enhances discrimination of tactile stimuli at that location. We investigated how vision of a body part stimulated and manipulations of gaze direction affect tactile processing. Participants' gaze was directed to one of their hands, with vision of this hand either available or prevented in different experiments. They had to detect infrequent tactile targets among non-targets. Somatosensory event-related brain potentials were recorded in response to stimulation of the hand towards which gaze was directed (G+ trials) and in response to stimulation of the other hand (G- trials). When vision (V+) of the hand gaze was directed at was available (G+V+), an early positivity overlapping with the P45 and N 80 component was observed for G+V+ trials relative to G-V- trials. In contrast, when the hands were occluded from view (V-), an enhanced N 140 component followed by a late negativity was observed for G+V- as compared to G-V- trials. It is suggested that vision of the body part stimulated can modulate processing in primary somatosensory cortex (S1), while effects of gaze direction in the absence of vision of the body part touched are located in higher order somatosensory areas. Such effects of vision and gaze on tactile processing may be mediated by pathways from multimodal brain regions to somatosensory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883807     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2274-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Coding the location of the arm by sight.

Authors:  M S Graziano; D F Cooke; C S Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Absence of gaze direction effects on EEG measures of sensorimotor function.

Authors:  C W Hesse; E Seiss; R M Bracewell; P Praamstra
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting.

Authors:  S P Tipper; D Lloyd; B Shorland; C Dancer; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120-to-N140 transition.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; A C Lukaszewicz; F Mauguière
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Selective attention effects on somatosensory event-related potentials.

Authors:  P T Michie
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Timing and spatial distribution of somatosensory responses recorded in the upper bank of the sylvian fissure (SII area) in humans.

Authors:  M Frot; F Mauguière
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; José van Velzen; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  14 in total

1.  Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

Authors:  George A Michael; Marie-Agnès Dupuy; Amélie Deleuze; Margaux Humblot; Bilitys Simon; Janick Naveteur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Viewing the body modulates tactile receptive fields.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Anastasia Christakou; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Representation of tactile curvature in macaque somatosensory area 2.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Charles E Connor; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Novel assessment of cortical response to somatosensory stimuli in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Nathalie L Maitre; Zachary P Barnett; Alexandra P F Key
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  The effects of immediate vision on implicit hand maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Enea F Pavone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Reveal Reduced Embodiment of Emotions in Autism.

Authors:  Martina Fanghella; Sebastian B Gaigg; Matteo Candidi; Bettina Forster; Beatriz Calvo-Merino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Rapid enhancement of touch from non-informative vision of the hand.

Authors:  Flavia Cardini; Matthew R Longo; Jon Driver; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.