Literature DB >> 22009129

Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

George A Michael1, Marie-Agnès Dupuy, Amélie Deleuze, Margaux Humblot, Bilitys Simon, Janick Naveteur.   

Abstract

Visual input and attention enhance tactile perception. But do they influence the perception of spontaneous sensations (SPS) arising in the absence of any external stimulus? We have investigated this by requiring subject to focus attention on each hand while orienting overtly toward it (convergent focusing) or away (divergent focusing) and to subsequently describe the properties of the SPS they felt. Subjects performed this task under free viewing conditions or while blindfolded. Enhanced perception of SPS was found under convergent focusing and also under free viewing conditions. However, the effects of focusing were different whether visual input was available or not. When visual input was available, SPS were enhanced in the fingers but suppressed in the palm, suggesting that enhancement and suppression operated to refine perception of SPS. When visual input was unavailable, only enhancement was observed, even in areas of the hand where suppressing effects were found under free viewing conditions. These interacting effects between vision and attention were observed exclusively in the left hand. A control experiment failed to evidence whether looking at different parts of the hand modulates SPS. We suggest that vision facilitates perception and, when interacting with attention, it enables better perception by promoting suppression of SPS arising in areas of lower sensitivity that may interfere with processing in more sensitive zones. The results are discussed with respect to mechanisms lateralized in the right cerebral hemisphere, and a role of SPS in the maintenance of a conscious image of the body is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009129     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2901-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  68 in total

1.  Regional brain activation due to pharmacologically induced adrenergic interoceptive stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Oliver G Cameron; Satoshi Minoshima
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A critical review of congenital phantom limb cases and a developmental theory for the basis of body image.

Authors:  Elfed Huw Price
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2005-09-22

4.  Right and left cerebral hemisphere damage and tactile perception: performance of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the body.

Authors:  T J Boll
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Hemianopia, hemianaesthesia, and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference.

Authors:  R Sterzi; G Bottini; M G Celani; E Righetti; M Lamassa; S Ricci; G Vallar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Lateral differences in tactile directional perception.

Authors:  A L Benton; N R Varney; K S Hamsher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Vision of the body increases interference on the somatic signal detection task.

Authors:  Laura Mirams; Ellen Poliakoff; Richard J Brown; Donna M Lloyd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Fooling your feelings: artificially induced referred sensations are linked to a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Nina Noennig; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  T Mima; T Nagamine; K Nakamura; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  In (or outside of) your neck of the woods: laterality in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Sylvia Hach; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

2.  Visual and spatial modulation of tactile extinction: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Chiara F Sambo; Giuseppe Vallar; Paola Fortis; Roberta Ronchi; Lucio Posteraro; Bettina Forster; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.