Literature DB >> 15197527

Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception.

Sander Zuidhoek1, Albertine Visser, Merle E Bredero, Albert Postma.   

Abstract

It has been argued that representations of peripersonal space based on haptic input are systematically distorted by egocentric reference frames. Interestingly, a recent study has shown that noninformative vision (i.e., freely viewing the region above the haptic workspace) improves performance on the so-called haptic parallel-setting task, in which participants are instructed to rotate a test bar until it is parallel to a reference bar. In the present study, we made a start at identifying the different sensory integration mechanisms involved in haptic space perception by distinguishing the possible effects of orienting mechanisms from those of noninformative vision. We found that both the orienting direction of head and eyes and the availability of noninformative vision affect parallel-setting performance and that they do so independently: orienting towards a reference bar facilitated the parallel-setting of a test bar in both no-vision and noninformative vision conditions, and noninformative vision improved performance irrespective of orienting direction. These results suggest the effects of orienting and noninformative vision on haptic space perception to depend on distinct neurocognitive mechanisms, likely to be expressed in different modulations of neural activation in the multimodal parietofrontal network, thought to be concerned with multimodal representations of peripersonal space. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197527     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1938-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Haptic perception of spatial relations.

Authors:  A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Subjective image of invisible hand coded by monkey intraparietal neurons.

Authors:  S Obayashi; M Tanaka; A Iriki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-01

4.  Localization of a seen finger is based exclusively on proprioception and on vision of the finger.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-10

6.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Astrid M L Kappers; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; David I Shore; Charles Spence; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Reduction of cutaneous reaction time by directing eyes towards the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J Honoré; M Bourdeaud'hui; L Sparrow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis.

Authors:  M Annett
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

10.  Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans.

Authors:  E Làdavas; G di Pellegrino; A Farnè; G Zeloni
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  14 in total

1.  Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Guillaume Michaud; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Roderik F Viergever
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Rick van Dijk; Astrid M L Kappers; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Wouter B Schakel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Joram J van Rheede; Albert Postma; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.

Authors:  Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Keep an eye on your hands: on the role of visual mechanisms in processing of haptic space.

Authors:  Albert Postma; Sander Zuidhoek; Matthijs L Noordzij; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-15

10.  Characteristics of Haptic Peripersonal Spatial Representation of Object Relations.

Authors:  Ryo Wako; Saho Ayabe-Kanamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.