Literature DB >> 26676120

CORR Insights(®): Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Thomas Jefferson Blumenfeld1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26676120      PMCID： PMC4746174          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-015-4649-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  C Perka; R Ludwig
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.

Authors:  M J Christie; S A Barrington; M F Brinson; M E Ruhling; D K DeBoer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stuart Goodman; Hillary Saastamoinen; Nadav Shasha; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Implant choices, technique, and results in revision acetabular surgery: a review.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mariano Fernández-Fairen; Antonio Murcia; Agustin Blanco; Antonio Meroño; Antonio Murcia; Jorge Ballester
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.

Authors:  Raymond Yu; Jochen G Hofstaetter; Thomas Sullivan; Kerry Costi; Donald W Howie; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; D G Lewallen; A D Hanssen; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ginger E Holt; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A new strategy to reconstruct type III acetabular bone defect associated with inflammatory pseudotumor: combined medial and lateral acetabular bone grafting: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dejiu Wang; Jiang Du; Zhen Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.